MOVED: Rules Clarification

Welcome, Miket2424!

You could try reducing transports’ defense value.  If a transport rolls a 1, roll again and only hit on a 3 or less.  This would effectively halve their defensive capability.

You could also try using the transport rules from the new Anniversary game (see pages 13-16, 18-19, 21 and 31).  This is a bit more radical approach, and may require tweaking the setup a bit to counter the reduction in combat strength of some fleets.

yes, but it costs money so you could - literally - through the game away researching it or maybe snatch a victory out of the jaws of defeat.

If you were posting in a thread here and that thread is gone, check elsewhere on the site.

If it was about finding a game, look there.  If it became political or non-game, look in those areas.

just keeping the boards ordered…

No change, that is a legal move.

THe lack of ability of an ally to claim lands diurect from a fallen ally I always took to be “allied support of the resistance”.

As for income though, with no central government, the taxing ability is gone, and thus so is the income generating capability of those lands… at least until a new adminsitrative authority comes in to restore order (either Allied or Enemy).

visit house rules section and find our team… we are remaping the DNA of axis and allies