@noneshallpass thanks guys. I had a game where I was chasing the Utti jaegers all over Finland for a few turns kind of frustrating lol they’re near impossible to knock out if they can just retreat immediately and stack up

@jbuckbuddy You should always use ANZAC under a different color than UK and the reason why I say this is because if ANZAC and UK attack, as long as an ANZAC unit is present, you can give that territory to ANZAC instead of UK if you wish to of course.

Plus you should keep the colors different so you can see force projection by ANZAC. If ANZAC surrenders before UK, you need to know what units are going off the board.

@aldrahill I did end up seeing in the admiral rules scw expansion compatibility part says Soviets and Germans can each place a commander at game start if using the full support option

I always understood it as ‘Tundra’ zones were those with the shading of the northern Russian zones, northern Canadian zones and Iceland while the ‘Ice’ zones were those with white shading like Antarctica, Greenland and Iceland but that was just me.

I dont care for the tundra/ice rules either but I like the idea of only ski troops being able to move through them.

@jbuckbuddy Agreed. Same with Iran and Iraq, or other such.
This just shows how important Transcaucasia is.

Yes it appears it was accidently removed, see the errata.

@hms-serapis Germany can likely bomb London and London can likely bomb German held Paris. I saw the Germans strat bombing factories in Russia in Operation Skyhook but that was late game. you can also bomb railroads and docks/ports/airfields to halt lend lease delivery or help surround a city.

@general-5-stars Thanks for sending! Interesting rules there! A lot of what I was thinking too (glad I was on the right track haha).

Yeah, I think the idea is a lot of fun to have them added in! I think it’s ripe for expansion possibility, but who knows!

@Linkler I don’t remember where I heard this, it might have been one of Doug’s Youtube updates, but I had heard somewhere that they didn’t really have any immediate plans for really any expansions for a little while. They’ve been focusing on Meltdown (which just released) and 1914 so much, as well as Midway earlier this year, that I think any expansions have really taken a back seat! I’d personally like to see expansions as well, since the 1936 game is really the one that interests me haha.

@insanehoshi I could see 3 for the big one for me it’s hard to tell I think we might play test it with the little gliders at 1IPP and the big ones at 2 I could see where someone might think thats a bit light though

@trig perfect, thanks

@noneshallpass haha yeah I got that your all saying the same thing sorry my wording maybe. Thank you guys

@insanehoshi cool: good info.

@insanehoshi thanks!

Just watched Eastory’s video about the Sino Japanese War, got me thinking more about the oil expansion :P I want Japan to feel like it NEEDS to attack the Indonesian islands for oil! Because of the weird movement rules / not needing oil to move infantry and cavalry when out of oil, the oil system just kind of… doesn’t work properly.

Plus, Germany way too much oil :/

@mike141500 they would be safe until Germany goes to war, at least. We had a game where Germany aligned Argentina super distracting for US kept them busy for 3 or 4 turns where they could’ve been using their stuff to fight in Europe

@noneshallpass well then winning means that you would go first. problem solved

@all-encompassing-goose
No.
The CCP was established in 1921. The PRC wasn’t established until 1949. This game takes place before 1949.

@theveteran
It is one of the golden rules in designing, that rules are intuitively written. Generalization of concepts leads to faster game play and less discussion and looking up rules takes away from gaming time and enjoyment.