May 22, 2013, 02:00:01 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Axis and Allies first turns - United Kingdom  (Read 2468 times)
Nix
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Aircraft Carrier
*
******
Posts: 2724

League 2012: 1 wins, 0 Losses


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2007, 02:54:27 pm »
0

Australia or Southafrica depending on what you want to do;

Australia=KJF, US needs to put up shop in Sinkiang and/or build pacific fleet, Ukmoves AC,Trn, Aussies ub+trn to SZ30 (best if this was thought out on R1 so a rusian fig could land on carrier) builds a BB UK2 in australia, and unite fleet if neccesary.

Southafrica=KGF, uses this to stop German advancement in Africa (and might hinder japaneese from conquering it later on)
Logged
polywog
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 292


Russian Battleships - they exist.


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2007, 03:01:44 pm »
0

Quote
It can land in Bury. E Can-W Can-sz63-sz62-sz60-Bury.

Wow, I totally missed the small connection between WCan and SZ63 at the top of the map. 

Yeah - I missed this once too. Unfortunately, my opponent showed it to me with 8 INF, 8 ARM in western Canada. Remember to keep a few good defending US units in west US. It's a pretty embarrassing way to lose.
Logged
Cobert
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 249


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2007, 05:16:00 pm »
0

I <3 these threads.  Seriously.

Ive never quite been able to get a KJF to work properly.
Logged
U-505
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*******
Posts: 11383


Rollin' hard, Rollin' fast, Rollin' by


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2007, 07:37:58 pm »
0

Quote
It can land in Bury. E Can-W Can-sz63-sz62-sz60-Bury.

Wow, I totally missed the small connection between WCan and SZ63 at the top of the map.  That almost seems unfair to bypass Alaska! cool  Thanks, U-505.  Off topic, your moniker implies you like playing Germany.  With NA I saw a guy take U-Boat Interdiction and buy subs, taking away something like 16IPCs per turn from the Allies.  Have you tried that?


I have yet to play with NA's. Nobody here really uses them and some are more powerful than others so it can unbalance the game.

And yes, I do prefer to play Germany, or Japan. Each for different reasons.

As far as UK goes, I think it's wasteful to go KJF simply because you can't focus all of UK's income to Asia. Unless England is exclusively used to build aircraft to support KJF once it has been fortified enough to prevent a German invasion.
Logged
Cmdr Jennifer
Site Moderator
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 46922


Die Flottenmörderin


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 15, 2007, 08:25:45 pm »
0

Well, I think NAs might be having a renessaince.  I'm seeing more and more players pulling out NAs just to add some flavor to the game.
Logged
axis_roll
A&A.org Battleship
******
Posts: 4342


Spring 2008 Singles champion (Gold medalist)


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2007, 03:48:16 am »
0

Well, I think NAs might be having a renessaince.  I'm seeing more and more players pulling out NAs just to add some flavor to the game.
What did you think of the Enhanced NA's?
Logged
Cmdr Jennifer
Site Moderator
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 46922


Die Flottenmörderin


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2007, 07:06:22 am »
0

I really havn't delved much into the AARHE and I've only played AARe once.  AARe makes Germany way too powerful.  Mainly because its almost impossible to find submarines in the game which means Germany can float 4 submarines around England and cut their production by almost 100%.

I think the Uboat interdiction rules need to be amended.  Either make it easier to find submarines by giving America and England Sonar Planes/Bouys like they had so that planes can detect submarines without destroyers and then kill them or do away with the interdiction.


Also, Hawaii should not be a VC.  Make it Anchorage, AL.  Hawaii is too difficult for America to defend in a traditional game.  On the flip side, Ukraine needs to be a VC.
Logged
axis_roll
A&A.org Battleship
******
Posts: 4342


Spring 2008 Singles champion (Gold medalist)


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2007, 08:47:06 am »
0

I really havn't delved much into the AARHE and I've only played AARe once.  AARe makes Germany way too powerful.  Mainly because its almost impossible to find submarines in the game which means Germany can float 4 submarines around England and cut their production by almost 100%.

I think the Uboat interdiction rules need to be amended.  Either make it easier to find submarines by giving America and England Sonar Planes/Bouys like they had so that planes can detect submarines without destroyers and then kill them or do away with the interdiction.


Also, Hawaii should not be a VC.  Make it Anchorage, AL.  Hawaii is too difficult for America to defend in a traditional game.  On the flip side, Ukraine needs to be a VC.
Thanks for your feedback, since this thread was about National Advantages, I was more asking your opinion of the NA's themselves and not too much of the overall Enhanced rules set.  We can discuss that elsewhere.......
Logged
goldenbearflyer
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 109


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 16, 2007, 09:22:50 am »
0

Well, back on topic about UK first turns, I agree that KJF is not so great for UK.  When I think of KJF I think of US KJF.  Do the math:  US pits 42 IPCs against 30 for J.  UK + R = 54 to 40 for G.  UK must help R.  When people talk about UK KJF, that often translates to "build IC in India".  Everyone knows this subsequently drains 9 or more IPCs per turn away from the Western front.  But that's the challenge, can UK split its efforts and be effective?  That's why UK is probably my favorite nation to play -- in sports you would call them the "X factor", the difference maker.
Logged
Bunnies P Wrath
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2142


Fear the Wrath of P


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 16, 2007, 09:54:29 am »
0

KJF Plan 1:  (UK/USSR take on Germany, US takes on Japan)

USSR:  "Stall those Germans!  Trade territory!"
UK:  "My air force is bigger than Jesus!"
US:  "My air force IS Jesus."

KJF Plan 2:  (UK IC in India, US IC in India)

USSR:  "Ooo, Imma smack you so hard with these Burytia infantry!"
UK:  "And Imma protect those Burytia infantry with my fighter!"
US:  "I can't see the water.  I have too many ships."
Logged
goldenbearflyer
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 109


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 16, 2007, 10:00:05 am »
0

Quote
UK:  "My air force is bigger than Jesus!"

If John Lennon and the Beatles had been around, he would have said they were bigger than RAF AND Jesus.  Wait, was he a baby in WWII?  Maybe he WAS there.
Logged
ncscswitch
Guest
« Reply #26 on: March 17, 2007, 02:45:23 am »
0


US:  "I can't see the water.  I have too many ships."

No, you need to re-roll your attack on my US fleet, there are TWO red chips under the Battleship, not 1...
 afro
Logged
goldenbearflyer
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 109


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 17, 2007, 10:07:11 pm »
0


US: "I can't see the water. I have too many ships."

No, you need to re-roll your attack on my US fleet, there are TWO red chips under the Battleship, not 1...
 afro

Until I read the Caspian Sub policy papers, I would not have really gotten that joke!
Logged
ncscswitch
Guest
« Reply #28 on: March 18, 2007, 02:58:16 am »
0

Sorry, I guess it was a bit targetted at those of us who use an actual game board since i don;t think you have to use chips to designate "stacks" with the mapping programs.
Logged
goldenbearflyer
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 109


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: March 18, 2007, 08:40:23 pm »
0

Sorry, I guess it was a bit targetted at those of us who use an actual game board since i don;t think you have to use chips to designate "stacks" with the mapping programs.

No, I get that, because I do use the actual board game.  What I meant was, I think your joke plays on that US strategy of building lots of battleships, which I read about at Caspian Sub.  There's tons of interesting stuff there.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!