May 18, 2013, 10:32:10 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
  Print  
Author Topic: AARHE: Map files  (Read 35831 times)
Bierwagen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 277



View Profile
« Reply #150 on: May 11, 2008, 09:50:56 am »
0

Afternoon!

Back with another fist full of questions for both LITE & AARHE 4.0.  For starters a few map clarifications:

- There appears to be an intentional amphibious assault landing into Western Europe out of SZ 13.  Is this correct?

- Can the allies enter the Northeastern portion of SZ 5 (e.g., the part in front of the canal) in order to invade Germany?

- We were curious what the intent behind the canal in Denmark is

- Can a fleet in SZ 34 repair in Cairo, or is it cut off by the canal?

- Do the VCs turn the whole country into a dock or just a specific SZ? (e.g., does Rio de Janeiro support SZs 22 & 18 or just SZ 22)

Thanks,
Bierwagen
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #151 on: May 11, 2008, 04:30:30 pm »
0

There appears to be an intentional amphibious assault landing into Western Europe out of SZ 13.  Is this correct?
Quote
- Can the allies enter the Northeastern portion of SZ 5 (e.g., the part in front of the canal) in order to invade Germany?

- We were curious what the intent behind the canal in Denmark is

- Can a fleet in SZ 34 repair in Cairo, or is it cut off by the canal?

- Do the VCs turn the whole country into a dock or just a specific SZ? (e.g., does Rio de Janeiro support SZs 22 & 18 or just SZ 22)

1) No they must control western Europe and Norway first.
2) The Germans had mined the danish straights with both sub net and sea mines. their is no way in hell of any allied ships getting into the Baltic or any Soviet units getting out once placed there. The allies to even have a chance to get in would have to control the coast and send teams of men to clear the mines. Also Germany had guns to fire at passing enemy ships. In game terms the idea that Germany has to build a navy for the sole purpose of protecting Berlin from capture is an abomination and fantasy. Nothing even remotely like an allied invasion of the coast of the Baltic was possible due to weather, underwater currents,and many other issues. Now in game terms if Germany wants a navy its for the purpose of actually using it to sink ships and not building CV to protect Berlin et al.
3) No it must be in SZ 15 to repair.
4) The sea zone adjacent to the city is where the dock can only be made

keep up with more questions!


Logged
tekkyy
A&A.org Aircraft Carrier
******
Posts: 2548


View Profile
« Reply #152 on: May 12, 2008, 05:01:00 am »
0

more info

SZ13 vs. Western Europe
SZ13 is not intended to be adjacent to Western Europe
similarly Karelia is not intended to be adjacent to SZ3
in this aspect AARHE is just as bad as the Revised map (borders not sharp enough)

SZ5
SZ5 and SZ12 are considered one sea zone
the canal/waterway icon are between the corresponding
so if you go from SZ6 to SZ5 you must engage enemy in SZ5
if you go from SZ12 to SZ13 you must engage enemy in SZ13

the situation at SZ5 is a little complicated and wasn't draw clearly
we don't want the revised-style SUPER SZ5 that was adjacent to 5 territories and 1 neutral
the Denmark situation
maybe there is better way to draw it that I overlooked

Canal in Denmark
the idea is that Denmark should be put in territory Germany rather than territory Western Europe,
the Denmark waterway is like Gibraltar, except with its promixty to Germany homeland it was a different kettle of fish

repair at VC
interesting question, I didn't think of that
I guess we don't want inland VCs like Tehran or Toronto to repair ships
then again did Russia not have naval facilities at Black Sea?

it must be clarified (repair at sea zone adjacent to VC/IC...what is adjacent?) or people could consider ICs are built at VCs hence the same treatment as the example given at Cairo

dock at VC
does that mean we can't dock at Turkey or Spain?
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #153 on: May 12, 2008, 11:19:40 am »
0

Quote
then again did Russia not have naval facilities at Black Sea?

yes they had a black sea fleet part of it was stationed at Sevastopol

Cairo is facing the Medd. Its not in the red sea. Dock for repair or whatever would be from Medd.

Spain has its IC adjacent to both sides, so the deployment can be either. Turkey should be in Dardanelles which is a natural port for military ships
Logged
Bierwagen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 277



View Profile
« Reply #154 on: May 15, 2008, 06:07:34 pm »
0

Gah!


SZ13 vs. Western Europe
SZ13 is not intended to be adjacent to Western Europe
similarly Karelia is not intended to be adjacent to SZ3
in this aspect AARHE is just as bad as the Revised map (borders not sharp enough)

I spent all that effort printing off and gluing these wonderful maps IL created.  Then I covered them with clear plastic.

/cry.
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #155 on: May 15, 2008, 06:14:08 pm »
0

Its easily fixed!!!!


I will make a sticker you can DL and cover up the wrong line with a strip of water, and another decal for the new line.

Again just tell me which line your talking about?

Ill have it ASAP
Logged
Bierwagen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 277



View Profile
« Reply #156 on: May 17, 2008, 03:35:07 am »
0

Its easily fixed!!!!
I will make a sticker you can DL and cover up the wrong line with a strip of water, and another decal for the new line.

Brilliant!  I'm not sure why I didn't think of that.  Now I can mod to my hearts content!

I haven't done anything special.  Before I committed $135 to Kinkos for a full banner print of the maps, I used MS Publisher to print them off.  I used a small overlap, for alignment purposes, on 8.5" x 11".  After carefully trimming and taping them all together the map was glued to a nice 1/16" pressboard surface on a 1" x 2 " frame for stability.

I tried shellac on my first prototype, but it started warping, so I framed them and put some felt coasters on the bottom so it wouldn't scratch other surfaces.

Since shellac didn't work too well, someone had the bright idea to use clear contact paper (e.g., 24' x 18" rolls for ~$5 @ Home Depot).  Voila!  Cheap and easy way to protect it.

The first board came out at 55" x 30" and the second one was slightly smaller at 48" x 28".  They even fit nicely in the back of my Toyota Corolla wink

The extra elbow room was a big hit at our recent gathering.

I'll post some pictures next time I get a functioning camera -- they are all on the fritz again.

- Bierwagen
Logged
tekkyy
A&A.org Aircraft Carrier
******
Posts: 2548


View Profile
« Reply #157 on: May 17, 2008, 07:32:12 am »
0

I go for budget and just print them on consumer printers

not top quality stuff
no big impact of A0 poster

but its good that its modular
like modular armour hehe
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #158 on: May 17, 2008, 10:18:26 am »
0

I may have to create ghost print lines on the AARHE map for each 8.5x11 section so people can more easily print from desktop printer... I could prepare a guide on printing out the map to make it easy.

I do know about a polyurethane gloss that you spray over paper to protect it from moisture... you buy this from any art store and it comes in a large can. Its important because changes in moisture may run the ink.

another proposal is you buy the cold lamination sheets and stick them on like tape all over the pages to protect them. Id would think you should buy the legal size so it overlaps the 8.5x11 ( 11x14)
Logged
tekkyy
A&A.org Aircraft Carrier
******
Posts: 2548


View Profile
« Reply #159 on: May 19, 2008, 02:23:56 am »
0

ghost lines?
I just chop the image
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #160 on: May 19, 2008, 09:36:09 am »
0

The 'ghost experiment' didn't work as it deluded the colors.. oh well.
Logged
Bierwagen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 277



View Profile
« Reply #161 on: June 25, 2008, 07:22:42 pm »
0

AARHE Map:

20080303_AARHE_standard_with_setup.pdf

OMG - Turkey!  What the hell does the strait do? 

You disconnected sz 14 from sz 16. 

The axis converted Turkey to their side with -5 and the Turkish army popped up.  Now they want to move the army from Turkey through the Bosporus Strait to the Balkans because it is colored grey on both sides.  Germany has fallen to US/UK and this is the closest army they have -- so the situation is dire.

Can you clarify the intent of this map modification?  It is our first time this has happened and we can't come to consensus.

I thought this area represented the gun implacements there used for defense, not a land bridge.

Thanks in advance,
- Bierwagen
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #162 on: June 25, 2008, 10:29:24 pm »
0

AARHE Map:

20080303_AARHE_standard_with_setup.pdf

Quote
OMG - Turkey!  What the hell does the strait do?

You disconnected sz 14 from sz 16.

The axis converted Turkey to their side with -5 and the Turkish army popped up.  Now they want to move the army from Turkey through the Bosporus Strait to the Balkans because it is colored grey on both sides.  Germany has fallen to US/UK and this is the closest army they have -- so the situation is dire.

Can you clarify the intent of this map modification?  It is our first time this has happened and we can't come to consensus.

I thought this area represented the gun implacements there used for defense, not a land bridge.

The strait does represent control by Turkey against all enemies prohibiting passage of naval into or outside of Black sea, Use strait interdiction rules on this against Soviet ships . Turkey at -5 allows her units to move outside and fight along side German units anywhere in Europe. Also, Turkey can build units up to her income because she has a factory.

I also thought you said that the Axis were always winning the games? So guess the allies are learning a few tricks?


Logged
Bierwagen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 277



View Profile
« Reply #163 on: June 26, 2008, 03:33:55 pm »
0

The real question:  Is Turkey now connected to the Balkan's via that little sliver of land?

We converted the neutrals to German units, but couldn't figure out if they were allowed to move straight to the Balkan's or did they have to take a different route.

It was close, but Axis still won.  Russia was overrun by the Japanese and German was still getting 17 IPC even at 50% reduction.
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13544


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #164 on: June 26, 2008, 06:49:36 pm »
0

Quote
The real question:  Is Turkey now connected to the Balkan's via that little sliver of land?

The territory of Turkey DOES connect, allowing passage of war material into the south eastern Europe, providing Turkey is at war. So yes.

Quote
We converted the neutrals to German units, but couldn't figure out if they were allowed to move straight to the Balkan's or did they have to take a different route.

They can thats the point of getting Turkey on your side so Germany can get panzers into Soviet back door or Africa and avoid needing ships to transport that stuff.

Quote
It was close, but Axis still won.  Russia was overrun by the Japanese and German was still getting 17 IPC even at 50% reduction.

The lend lease was supposed to be 50% more NOT reduction.  If you reduced LL to Russia by 50% no wonder they lost.

Try playing with historical victory conditions ( no japs into Russia unless Moscow falls)
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!