|
tekkyy
|
 |
« Reply #90 on: August 27, 2006, 10:50:59 pm » |
0
|
I am still confused let me try to ask differently
how come many continent lines have improved in realism (eg. Gilbratar, Japan, Pacific Islands) but you don't want to change Turkey so that it shows clearer you can now move between Turkey and Balkans?
what was the base map you used?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #91 on: August 28, 2006, 06:59:46 am » |
0
|
Thrace will get in the way guys... It will be a violation of Neutrality...
GG
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tekkyy
|
 |
« Reply #92 on: August 28, 2006, 07:39:03 am » |
0
|
you are now allowed to attack neutral territories you may also get them to join your side thru diplomatic dices some neutrals have armies (most apparently Spain, Turkey, Sweden) check out the latest draft under "phase 8: diplomacy" http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=7188.0
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #93 on: August 28, 2006, 08:43:49 am » |
0
|
So is this "attacking"? I think this would give them a enemy "diplomatic chit"...
GG
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Imperious Leader
|
 |
« Reply #94 on: August 28, 2006, 10:42:50 am » |
0
|
how come many continent lines have improved in realism (eg. Gilbratar, Japan, Pacific Islands) but you don't want to change Turkey so that it shows clearer you can now move between Turkey and Balkans?
what was the base map you used?
+++ i still used the base map (original) but tracing was done with some minor considerations. The opening is large to show its easy to move into the balkans w/o looking too weird... (like a flood occured)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tekkyy
|
 |
« Reply #95 on: August 28, 2006, 06:48:21 pm » |
0
|
So is this "attacking"? I think this would give them a enemy "diplomatic chit"...
well the neutral isn't on your team and you move troops there you attack it it joins the enemy immediately what do you mean "diplomactic chit"?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #96 on: August 28, 2006, 07:01:45 pm » |
0
|
another words, it decreases from your side one level...
GG
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Imperious Leader
|
 |
« Reply #97 on: August 28, 2006, 08:36:55 pm » |
0
|
when a neutral is attacked by you it immediatly becomes a full bar ally of the nearest enemy player. They have full use of it: economics, military
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tekkyy
|
 |
« Reply #98 on: August 29, 2006, 03:14:25 am » |
0
|
+++ i still used the base map (original) but tracing was done with some minor considerations. The opening is large to show its easy to move into the balkans w/o looking too weird... (like a flood occured)
oh, like 2nd edition map or something? cos it looks different to revised opening is large to show its easy to move into balkans? move into Balkans from where?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tekkyy
|
 |
« Reply #99 on: September 07, 2006, 07:36:40 pm » |
0
|
hows the "no Italy map" coming along? added VC in yet?
have you adjusted the Turkey area so its easily seen you can move from Balkans in Turkey? and add the canal "double line" and position it so its clear you need control of Turkey to go into Black Sea...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Imperious Leader
|
 |
« Reply #100 on: September 07, 2006, 08:09:42 pm » |
0
|
I will start on it this weekend..
I will add an arrow to show linkage for turkey
canal for suez and panama will have those lines
actually turkey should be the same treatment as suez .. hence it should get the canal lines...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tekkyy
|
 |
« Reply #101 on: September 07, 2006, 08:27:31 pm » |
0
|
yeah whats what I meant it should be the "double red lines" canal symbol since thats how our rules have it for Black Sea
just instead of in the middle of two territories (like Anglo-Egypt and Trans-Jordon) it'll be fully inside Turkey (like Panama)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|