June 18, 2013, 05:23:47 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Poll
Question: Should Germany build a new IC?  If so, where?  (Voting closed: August 13, 2005, 02:31:56 pm)
W. Europe - 2 (10%)
E. Europe - 0 (0%)
Balkans - 3 (15%)
Norway - 0 (0%)
Ukraine S.S.R. - 1 (5%)
Not sure where it should go, but it sounds cool! - 0 (0%)
No, they should not.  Try to take someone elses... - 14 (70%)
Total Voters: 20

Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: German IC  (Read 1129 times)
AgentOrange
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 620


"Hey look at that dead guy... Let's go that way."


View Profile
« on: August 13, 2005, 02:31:56 pm »
0

Do you think it might be wise to build a new German IC other than the ones they start with?  I've never done it, but I've always wondered if it might help.  Tell me what you think.
Logged
UKcommander
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Submarine
*
****
Posts: 944



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2005, 09:57:12 am »
0

If I had to buy an industrial complex for Germany I'd have to say the Balkans.  It makes Germany's supply lines for attacks on the Caucasus shorter however it does take away money on a turn that could otherwise be put towards infantry or armor.  I would reccomend against buying an IC for Germany.
Logged
Bean
A&A.org Battleship
******
Posts: 3243



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2005, 03:45:03 pm »
0

Germany building an IC is sort of like Russia building an IC - you don't want to because you need every combat unit you can get your hands on, and you don't need to because the action's already hot and heavy where you start. Japan/US/UK have the option of putting ICs in their territories because they're relatively isolated from direct assaults on their capitals and their capitals are far from the action across the map.
Logged
Hannibal ad portas
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2005, 03:49:51 am »
0

I'm inclined to agree that Germany has better things to spend their bloody-hard-won IPCs on than a factory that's only a space, at best, closer to the action.

-However-, the notion of an IC in Anglo-Egypt has struck me several times after looking over the board.  It's a location that strategically commands the link between a Japanese Naval Reinforcement, holds the Axis-Road-Less-Traveled to Asia, maintains a presence directly in Africa-continient-of-madness, and can be reinforced from another IC capable of pumping out 6 units a turn.

I'm not sure if the benefits outweigh the cost, but it's certainly a strong staging point, further solidifies German's hold on 'bonus' IPCs, and adds some flexibility in the otherwise static German/Russian standoff.

However, I have a feeling that as soon as an IC appeared in Anglo-Egypt, it'd be a green light for the US to launch Operation: Smackdown.
Logged
donkeypunchnightmare
A&A.org New Conscript

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2005, 08:53:33 am »
0

agent o
 if anyone sould buils an ic it sould be Japan in FIC or russia. you know how i feel about UK in india, helps to seal up the empire.
Logged
Begoner
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 33


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2005, 12:22:38 pm »
0

An IC in Anglo Egypt is the only one that makes sense, in my opinion.  Africa is worth 12 IPCs per turn.  If Germany, by buying an IPC in Africa, can hold Africa for an additional two turns, the benefits outweigh the cost, so it's a good choice.
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!