Pacific 1940 2nd Edition

[Yavid]

Has anyone seen the 2nd edition maps of both Europe and Pacific next to each other? Did they fix the ocean color so they match? Did they fix the Russian territory color so they match?

[Bob_A_Mickelson]

Has anyone seen the 2nd edition maps of both Europe and Pacific next to each other? Did they fix the ocean color so they match? Did they fix the Russian territory color so they match?

I would like to know this as well. I would also like to know what the top edge of the pacific board looks like. The national production chart was conveniently out of frame in all the pictures. I hav this erie (but hopefully unfounded) feeling that the chart might include 2 rows.

[Vance]

Notice how the IPCs on the Europe map go up to 40, so the Pacific map IPCs could start at 1 and if you're playing Global you just add 40.  Whatever, use monopoly money.

[knp7765]

I think they would have to make the maps that way for people that want to play Europe or Pacific by themselves. Not everyone would necessarily want to play Global. I agree that it's kind of a weird way of doing the IPC chart. They probably should have left that as a separate piece.

[Bob_A_Mickelson]

Separate detached chart is thebest solution in most cases. However if charts are printed on both maps I strongly prefer a global chart. I really think most people buy pacific for global and not for separate standalone game anyways.

[cwwgateway]

Two things I noticed:

It at least looks like the canadian markers have been changed to UK (but not in the europe game pics?)

In alpha 3 there's a fighter in Korea that isn't here now.

[Yavid]

Two things I noticed:

It at least looks like the canadian markers have been changed to UK (but not in the europe game pics?)

In alpha 3 there's a fighter in Korea that isn't here now.

The missing fighter might be a set-up error