June 17, 2013, 07:41:20 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Battleship showdown (march madness)  (Read 693 times)
ABWorsham
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1764


How much is your integrity worth?


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2012, 08:15:39 pm »
0

just wondering, why is the British ranked first when the Missouri is clearly a better ship? bigger guns, better guns, more AA guns, better protection, faster, and more maneuverable. just curious

I ranked them by stength of Navies around 1941. Had it been 1945, U.S would have been 1.
Logged
i rock
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 606


best tank ever B****


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2012, 11:38:27 am »
0

so... what are the results?
Logged
Red Harvest
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 138


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2012, 03:16:07 pm »
0

just wondering, why is the British ranked first when the Missouri is clearly a better ship? bigger guns, better guns, more AA guns, better protection, faster, and more maneuverable. just curious

I ranked them by stength of Navies around 1941. Had it been 1945, U.S would have been 1.

Problem is that the Iowa class wasn't launched until mid-1942 and commissioned in 1943.  So she's the most modern of the class.  In 1941 the South Dakota class would be the U.S. entrant.

The Jean Bart is an odd choice since she was incomplete and some of her guns were later placed on the namesake of the class, the Richelieu (which had lost some guns in action.)

The Yamato was commissioned Dec. 16, 1941, making it in after the start of the Pacific War, but before the end of 1941.

Logged
poloplayer15
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 208



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2012, 04:31:55 pm »
0

you could use the North Carolina instead as well seeing as it was commissioned in April of '41
Logged
Red Harvest
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 138


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2012, 05:59:03 pm »
0

you could use the North Carolina instead as well seeing as it was commissioned in April of '41

You are correct.   I had forgotten that the South Dakota wasn't commissioned until 1942. 

Of course ABWorsham is ranking contenders on the strength of their navies in 1941, rather than limiting the contest to 1941 era ships, so by that criteria the Iowa also works. 
Logged
ABWorsham
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1764


How much is your integrity worth?


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 11, 2012, 09:12:23 pm »
0

you could use the North Carolina instead as well seeing as it was commissioned in April of '41

You are correct.   I had forgotten that the South Dakota wasn't commissioned until 1942. 

Of course ABWorsham is ranking contenders on the strength of their navies in 1941, rather than limiting the contest to 1941 era ships, so by that criteria the Iowa also works. 

You're correct. Let's have the next round this weekend. Whats your thoughts on the Bismarck and Jean Bart match up?
Logged
Gargantua
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 10815


AA.org's Villain


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 12, 2012, 07:30:38 am »
0

BIZ MARK!
Logged
Red Harvest
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 138


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 12, 2012, 09:13:47 am »
0

Whats your thoughts on the Bismarck and Jean Bart match up?

That's a tough one, primarily because of how muddled the history of the French ships was (new/incomplete boats, Vichy/Free French, gun issues.)  Richelieu was sort of complete at the start of the war, Jean Bart wasn't.  Assuming a completed boat of the class one should probably still factor in teething troubles:  the Richelieu's guns did worse damage to themselves than their targets because of improper propellant/shell design issues.

The Richelieu was tough enough though.  It took some 15" hits with no significant damage.  Jean Bart also took some hits from the 16" battery of South Dakota class BB, but was still in action.  These French BB's were not as vulnerable as the Hood.

From what I gather the French ship's gunnery was a mess because the shells and propellant had not been properly tested, plus the close mounting of the 4-gun turrets produced a "wake effect" that created "excessive dispersion."

So in a fighting scenario I would expect it to go something like this:
At long range, where the Bismarck would be vulnerable to rounds plunging through her deck, the French ship wouldn't be able to hit anything without a lot of luck.  The Bismarck on the other hand would be able to find the range and pound away.  However, this fire likely would only cause non-crippling damage. 

As the range closed, the Richelieu/Jean Bart would finally be able to score some hits, but would be firing against the disproportionately thick belt armour of the Bismarck. 

Both would be bloodied, but still standing.  To break the tie comes down to discipline and ability to adapt, favoring the Bismarck.
Logged
CWO Marc
A&A.org Destroyer
*
*
*
*
*****
Posts: 1642


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 12, 2012, 10:23:39 am »
0

If the countries of the 1940's decided to solved WWII by a Battleship Duel [...]

Representative John S. Williams, from Mississippi, suggested something similar during a Congressional debate back around 1907 or 1908.  Unhappy with the decision to start construction of the battleship USS Michigan, he proposed "That whereas the battleship sea monster we are imitating has been named the Dreadnought – an archaic name – this man o’war is hereby named the Skeered o’ Nothin’ as an expression of our true American spirit: provided further, that it is hereby made the duty of the first captain who shall command her to challenge in the nation’s name the so-called Dreadnought to a duel a l’outrance, to take place upon the sea somewhere in sight of Long Island, and upon that occasion of the combat the President and his Cabinet … shall be entertained on the quarter deck as guests of the ship and the nation."
Logged
Gargantua
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 10815


AA.org's Villain


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 12, 2012, 10:58:11 am »
0

LOL

SKEEREd O NUTHIN!
Logged
poloplayer15
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 208



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2012, 11:50:36 am »
0

so when do we get to find out the results?
Logged
Pages: « 1 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!