May 21, 2013, 07:05:45 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 »
  Print  
Author Topic: My UK Strategy  (Read 1362 times)
captainhook
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 236


Yaaarrr! Ye be sailing aboard Captain Hook's ship!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 24, 2011, 03:29:41 pm »
0

My question follows:
In Alpha +2, if Germany play "as expected", meaning that they threaten the sea lion (by having a few barges, ect...) but are actually going more towards invading Russia.  How do you manage to keep the Italians off Egypt?

I know that might sound strange, but in all my games, the damn pizza-eating bastards take it...
Logged
JimmyHat
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 780


Please don't censor my posts!


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 24, 2011, 10:49:33 pm »
0

I've won before without a declaration of war against Russia in G3.  Then G4 you declare just to kill Russian shipping and take their NO away while your army redeploys from London to Germany.
Logged
Frontovik
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 616



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 25, 2011, 04:05:29 am »
0

My question follows:
In Alpha +2, if Germany play "as expected", meaning that they threaten the sea lion (by having a few barges, ect...) but are actually going more towards invading Russia.  How do you manage to keep the Italians off Egypt?

I know that might sound strange, but in all my games, the damn pizza-eating bastards take it...

leftovers from taranto and indian fighters should be enough.
Logged
Xandax
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 167


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2011, 08:40:56 am »
0

My question follows:
In Alpha +2, if Germany play "as expected", meaning that they threaten the sea lion (by having a few barges, ect...) but are actually going more towards invading Russia.  How do you manage to keep the Italians off Egypt?

I know that might sound strange, but in all my games, the damn pizza-eating bastards take it...

leftovers from taranto and indian fighters should be enough.

The fighters you need to keep off Japan?
Logged
Commando Brado
A&A.org Battleship
******
Posts: 3460


I EAT LIGHTNING AND CRAP THUNDER!


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2011, 10:01:09 am »
0

Building an IC in Egypt is a bad idea.
Logged
Frontovik
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 616



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2011, 03:36:14 am »
0

My question follows:
In Alpha +2, if Germany play "as expected", meaning that they threaten the sea lion (by having a few barges, ect...) but are actually going more towards invading Russia.  How do you manage to keep the Italians off Egypt?

I know that might sound strange, but in all my games, the damn pizza-eating bastards take it...

leftovers from taranto and indian fighters should be enough.

The fighters you need to keep off Japan?

what japanese force? and btw, 2 figs more or less won't matter i think
but true fact, it gives japan a bit easier job
but it stops italy dead in its tracks
and in my case, the game has seldom been won by axis on pacific board.
Logged
Rorschach
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 26, 2011, 05:18:01 am »
0

but, like i said before, would germany really try a sealion and bring america into the game 1-2 rounds early?Huh

Absolutely. 

Bringing the US in early in this manner brings them in to the Atlantic full force, freeing up Japan.  Plus you've taken out the UK from producing anything in Europe until the US can (hopefully) come and liberate London.  If you've done it cheaply (by the UK NOT building a london defense) that means that you have probably got more german units sitting in London that the US can handle in one round as well.

Then, Italy can concentrate on taking out Egypt all on it's own..
Logged
knp7765
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1913


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2011, 05:52:17 am »
0

Building an IC in Egypt is a bad idea.
I agree.  The UK building an IC in Egypt is pretty much a gift to the Italians.  In the games I have played, Italy just about always gets Egypt, usually round 1 or 2.  The Italian navy is too strong for what British navy is in the Med and with 3 transports full of troops and equipment, the Italians almost always over run the Brits and Aussies on Egypt.  As for the Taranto raid, it never happens in my games.  With the Germans sending a couple of planes to S. Italy, it is suicide for the British to attack SZ 95 or 97.
Logged
Frontovik
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 616



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2011, 08:47:07 am »
0

Building an IC in Egypt is a bad idea.
I agree.  The UK building an IC in Egypt is pretty much a gift to the Italians.  In the games I have played, Italy just about always gets Egypt, usually round 1 or 2.  The Italian navy is too strong for what British navy is in the Med and with 3 transports full of troops and equipment, the Italians almost always over run the Brits and Aussies on Egypt.  As for the Taranto raid, it never happens in my games.  With the Germans sending a couple of planes to S. Italy, it is suicide for the British to attack SZ 95 or 97.

2 transports at taranto can easily be taken out, so no egypt for italy...
Logged
Commando Brado
A&A.org Battleship
******
Posts: 3460


I EAT LIGHTNING AND CRAP THUNDER!


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2011, 09:20:03 am »
0

Yes, you can take out the 2 Italian transports but at what cost? If you do that, the Brit navy is toast by the Germany airforce and if anything is left over, the Italians finish them off, then rebuild their transports(cheap), get 5 NO's for no Allied navy in the med, can take N. Africa(another 5 NO's) and take Gib(denied Allied access to the med). I've always put the Brit fleet in SZ92, away from the German airforce, 3 spaces away from SZ109 and SZ110 and the Italians don't have enough firepower to take them out if you put 3 FTR's in Gib, plus another 2 FTR's or 1 FTR, 1 Tac on the AC. Much better option, IMHO. I'd rather lose Egypt than the Med, N. Africa & Gib. I always retreat from Egy if I need to. Kill the Italians in Eth, build in Saf because usually the Germany player doesn't go for Sea Lion once you build enough stuff in the UK and you usually have enough IPC's to build a few units down in Saf. By the time the Italians take Egy and every thing else they need, the US is the in war, takes Gib and Mor back Turn 4 and makes things very sticky for the Italians the rest of the game. And the Brits would have held most of Africa from the Italians. And the Italians can't really do much w/Russia by then, so it's game over for the Axis. I believe the better Italian strategy is, take N. Africa, forget about Egy, unless it's really easy to take, try and take out the Brit navy in the Med if possible but go hard for Russia, by going through Syr, Irq and Npr in the south. And helping the Germans through Rom.
Logged
Cmdr Jennifer
Site Moderator
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 46908


Die Flottenmörderin


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: June 26, 2011, 01:40:36 pm »
0

My question follows:
In Alpha +2, if Germany play "as expected", meaning that they threaten the sea lion (by having a few barges, ect...) but are actually going more towards invading Russia.  How do you manage to keep the Italians off Egypt?

I know that might sound strange, but in all my games, the damn pizza-eating bastards take it...

Ignore Germany, defend Egypt!  If England falls, WHO CARES???  Seriously, the Germans still can't win if England falls, England's going to fall anyway and you may as well make life has hellish for the Italians as possible anyway, since they are the deciding factor on whether or not Russia is defeated before America's invading West Germany.
Logged
Commando Brado
A&A.org Battleship
******
Posts: 3460


I EAT LIGHTNING AND CRAP THUNDER!


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: June 26, 2011, 10:37:54 pm »
0

I think you can defend Egypt AND prevent Sea Lion if you play your cards right. Or, at the very least, make things difficult in Egypt/Med for the Italians, until the US comes into the war and takes Gib, if it was taken and Mor/N. Africa. Then, it's really bad for the Italians.
Logged
captainhook
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 236


Yaaarrr! Ye be sailing aboard Captain Hook's ship!


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: June 27, 2011, 05:56:44 am »
0


leftovers from taranto and indian fighters should be enough.

At the risk of sounding retarded: what do you mean "taranto"?
Logged
poloplayer15
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 208



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: June 27, 2011, 06:16:55 am »
0

Taranto was the British attack on the Italian Battle fleet in the italian naval base of Taranto.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Taranto
Logged
captainhook
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 236


Yaaarrr! Ye be sailing aboard Captain Hook's ship!


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: June 27, 2011, 06:31:30 am »
0

I see.
So by saying "Taranto" what is referred to? The british fleet attacking the italian fleet in 95 or in 97?
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!