|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« on: September 04, 2003, 10:37:30 am » |
0
|
does anyone like to play with this rule???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MistaBiggs
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2003, 10:42:23 am » |
0
|
Yes and no. I like being able to destroy AA guns, but IC's are a bit costly to have to rebuild. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UKcommander
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2003, 11:57:45 am » |
0
|
Ever since I've know of industrial complexes and industrial bombing raids I've allowed the rule that IC's could be destroyed. However, AA guns, no  . Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2003, 03:08:01 pm » |
0
|
no... a bombing raid wouldn't require you to "expend" 15 to rebuild... it just damage the factory so the owner has to repair 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sherman28
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2003, 08:41:52 pm » |
0
|
I like the rule and use it. We play it like in W@W rules for example th Russians can move their capital...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UKcommander
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2003, 05:06:57 am » |
0
|
Can someone please clearly explain to me the rules of an industrial bombing run? Thanks a lot  .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2003, 03:31:44 pm » |
0
|
move any number of Bombers into an enemy IC Territory, and specify them for a bombing run (the bombers can be mixed between SBR's and attacking...)... During combat if the Defender has an AA in the IC Territory, he rolls a 1d6 for each Bomber... each 1 rolled, sends a bomber down without Bombing...all survivors roll 1d6 and the total number on the dice added up is removed from the enemies IPC stash... hope it helps... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Zhukov_2003
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2003, 11:53:54 am » |
0
|
how do the scorched earth rules work?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2003, 03:20:16 pm » |
0
|
if a territory is taking over and there is an IC and/or AA it can be chosen to be destroyed....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2003, 06:44:25 am » |
0
|
So does that mean the defender chooses to destroy their own AA or IC as a casualty?
If only the AA and/or IC are left, MUST they be destroyed before the attacker can take the territory?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2003, 10:04:22 am » |
0
|
So does that mean the defender chooses to destroy their own AA or IC as a casualty?
If only the AA and/or IC are left, MUST they be destroyed before the attacker can take the territory? no... the rule is to represent Russian scorched earth: the destruction of infrastructure so the enemy cannot use it.... although as russia you probably wouldn't do (because next turn you will take it back) it, but for India it's great.... yes the Defender chooses it and no the territory can be taken without the AA or IC being destroyed (sorry for the misclarification)....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Grigoriy Ivanovitch
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2003, 02:31:59 am » |
0
|
but for India it's great Unless of course Japan takes it in the first round and you've just wasted 15 IPCs on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2003, 07:50:55 am » |
0
|
but for India it's great Unless of course Japan takes it in the first round and you've just wasted 15 IPCs on it. either that or if Japan spends so much attention on the IC and loses it... at least he's made and your just dissapointed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UKcommander
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2003, 04:22:05 pm » |
0
|
Thanks for clearing that up for me GG  .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guerrilla Guy
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2003, 04:43:48 pm » |
0
|
Thanks for clearing that up for me GG  . shoye no prob...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|