May 23, 2013, 09:01:17 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Restricted unit production/placement and enhanced SBR  (Read 740 times)
Zero
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 290


View Profile
« on: September 25, 2003, 01:29:15 pm »
0

This house rule replaces Russia restricted.  All IC are limited to a maximum number of units produced per turn equal to the IPC production of the area they occupy.   So the maximum production for the Karelia is 3 units per turn.   8 units per turn for germany, 6 for southern Europe, 8 units for UK, etc.

SBR has an additional effect for every bomber that successfully completes an SBR (i.e. not shot down by AA)  place a chip under the IC bombed.  The max unit production of that area is reduced by 1 unit for each chip under the IC.  All chips are removed at the end of the placement phase for the owner of the IC.  This SBR effect is in addition to the normal IPC bombing damage.   Heavy bombers place 3 chips under an IC for each successful SBR.
Logged
Guerrilla Guy
Moderator
A&A.org Battleship
*
*
******
Posts: 3821


Official AaA.org Corporate Retreat Coordinator


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2003, 02:07:45 pm »
0

if your saying this historically, then I'd say no! Russia outproduced Germany and had alot of production in Keraila SSR... otherwise yes it is a neat idea.... but it is crippling for Russia maybe too much...
Logged
Zero
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 290


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2003, 02:14:34 pm »
0

Bah!  Historical accuracy is not what we are going for here.  "Is it entertaining?", is the only question I am interested in.  Cheesy
Logged
Guerrilla Guy
Moderator
A&A.org Battleship
*
*
******
Posts: 3821


Official AaA.org Corporate Retreat Coordinator


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2003, 07:00:55 am »
0

it's neat then!
Logged
UKcommander
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Submarine
*
****
Posts: 944



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2003, 04:43:17 pm »
0

Yes I agree that it is interesting, but don't you guys think it would be too badly damaging to the Soviet Union?
Logged
M-4_Sherman
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 157



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2003, 05:00:32 pm »
0

personally i think this hurts Russia far too much. the only way for Russia to survive is by sheer numbers, it doesnt have the financial capability to produce enough of the more advanced units to stay alive without  mountains of INF.  these are used mainly for defense and in support of the little armor and air force Russia has to cripple the German war machine. if not for that, then its cool. you might consider raising the amount of units karelia/russia (territory) can produce per turn. that should even things out enough so that Russia can have a decent game.
Logged
Guerrilla Guy
Moderator
A&A.org Battleship
*
*
******
Posts: 3821


Official AaA.org Corporate Retreat Coordinator


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2003, 05:18:07 pm »
0

SBR Rules are intersting...
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!