October 23, 2017, 02:25:48 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register AACalc  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Japanese Strategy  (Read 5675 times)
Emperor Mollari
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*******
Posts: 28131


The Emperor has returned.


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 27, 2011, 08:07:46 pm »
0

It's my understanding that if Japan attacks UK\ANZAC the US is free to declare war against all axis forces.  That seems suicidal as the US immediately gets upgraded IC's and a huge NO boost to income, Germany\Italy need those first 3 rounds of US neutrality.  Japan really has no choice but to concentrate on China until at least round 3 or UK\ANZAC declares war. IMHO.
Logged
ThomasJefferson
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 28, 2011, 08:20:37 am »
0

I concur, Especially since the Japanese get 10 IPC's for not going to war, that helps subsidize the cost of not going to war. In the theatre game only it makes total sense to go to war turn 1. But if Japan attacks turn 1, then they are writing a death sentence for Italy.
Logged
MadPup77
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 23


One Who Asks A Lot


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 28, 2011, 12:58:38 pm »
0

 Japan really has no choice but to concentrate on China until at least round 3

This is true, and not true...

Quote from: MadPup77
Quote from: Cmdr Jennifer
I seriously wonder if China is worth it.  Combined I think it's 1 Victory City, 23 IPC (not including Hong Kong and Korea.)  Wouldn't it be possible to hold some of the more important land, yield the lesser stuff and position for a stronger attack on ANZAC/East India territories?  It guals me seeing England/ANZAC getting the NO for all those islands (and the income) without really being able to do much against them.


I think china is worth it, but not all of it. Send a few men here and there, just to keep them on the down low. Focus most of your Transport men/art/tanks on India, and ANZAC. Like I said before, a minor factory, and 3 tanks a turn does a lot in that area. Yes that 18 IPCs, but still if you do the job right, you end up earning 60-70 IPCs a round.

Now I think that you should spend those 3 turns preparing mostly for the invasion of India and/or ANZAC.

As I have said before, that Minor IC in Shanghai does wonders for me.

Quote from: ThomasJefferson
But if Japan attacks turn 1, then they are writing a death sentence for Italy.

How so for Italy??? Italy is already at war with UK. Unless this is changed in Alpha rules??

(I use OOB rules)

~MadPup~
« Last Edit: January 28, 2011, 01:00:13 pm by MadPup77 » Logged
morrel
Guest
« Reply #33 on: January 28, 2011, 02:25:43 pm »
0

US is in then
Logged
JamesAleman
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2261


Always looking for an opportunity to exploit.


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 28, 2011, 04:19:40 pm »
0

Background: This post is in response to the Alpha 2 rules. I have set up the board but not played it. I am aware of the number of pieces added and moved compared to the Out Of Box (OOB) placement for which I have many games played regarding the Pacific Theater.

I agree with Jennifer that Australia can be an area of focus early on. I disagree with believing China is not worth it. I have ignored China to my peril. When playing Japan I select from 1 of the following 2 strategies:

1) India first with an early drive on China, secure south pacific islands and focus on Hawaii or Australia last for the win.

2) Cripple Australia first (staging on Caroline Islands) sweep to the south pacific islands choke off India and use minor factories to hold mainland victory cities. Capture Hawaii and Australia for the win, leaving India and W.US as the only allied cities.

I believe Japan has been given plenty of Infantry on mainland Asia to drive China into a manageable box, if not take them out. Many people have put forward the best ways to take India first, so I will focus on option 2, and address Jennifer's desired approach. I believe this is a harder approach to victory, but a viable choice.

This theory-craft is not tested, but is loosely based on other experiences, it is not my intent to make a blanket statement or imply certain success. Care should be taken when employing any strategy that is not well understood ,executed, or proven successful. Reader discretion is advised.

An early key to crippling Anzac is the 2 starting subs Japan begins the game with. I would suggest a starting purchase of 2 subs and 2 transports in addition to your starting fleet. I suspect you will want to keep the US neutral for 3 turns, so Anzac will have the opportunity to expand, however their NO's are tied to being at war, so they are likely to collect them once as Japan will be poised to cripple their economy swiftly.

From Caroline Islands, subs can reach convoy zones off of New South wales and Queensland. 3 subs will see Anzac brought to 5 IPCs, with 3 transports, New Zealand, W. Australia, and new Britain will remove 3 more IPCs and all NOs. Philippines, Celebes Islands and Java are all in range of Caroline Islands as well. By staging 6 or more transports loaded with units on Caroline Islands, Anzac will be forced to build land units and keep them in New South Wales.

Turn 1, the whole fleet should be moved to Caroline Islands and Paulau(ships that can't make Caroline). This threat of a turn 2 assault should keep Anzac from building navy. So to summarize on turn 3 or 4, when Japan spreads out from Caroline, Australia will be brought to 2 IPCs(+2 if they have Brazil), they get 3 if they manage to retake W. Australia. Taking New Britain keeps Anzac from having its island chain and original territories NO.

Staging the whole fleet on the Carolines will see the US pull its fleet back to W. US in all likelihood unless they are going Japan first. If New south wales can be taken with Hawaii by turn 7, you should still hold your starting cities and have a win.

Remember transports built in Japan can help you take Phillippines back from UK or in seizing Hawaii. If Anzac builds 3 units a turn, they will have 18 land units plus allied planes on turn 4. In theory, you can have your air force on Caroline by turn 3. They can land on New Zealand turn 4 if you capture it on turn 3 (grab Northwest territory or W. Australia too on turn 4 when you land air force), giving you range to hit New south wales with your whole air force and land on W or N. Australia by turn 5. (a few planes can be kept on Caroline to protect transports if they land on carriers off New South Wales). 3-6 loaded transports with your air force should be enough to take it on round 5 if this plan works. If you are not ready to take on turn 5 due to other air power needs, you will have choked off Anzacs wealth.

I envision most of Japan's builds being transports and land units maybe 1 or 2 complexes, India could go navy early on, but should not be able to destroy Japan's fleet. China will be fought with starting pieces, ignoring Russia will free up 12 more land units to drive on China with.

Just some food for thought. Comments anyone?
Logged
Emperor Mollari
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*******
Posts: 28131


The Emperor has returned.


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 28, 2011, 07:53:08 pm »
0

Background: This post is in response to the Alpha 2 rules. I have set up the board but not played it. I am aware of the number of pieces added and moved compared to the Out Of Box (OOB) placement for which I have many games played regarding the Pacific Theater.

I agree with Jennifer that Australia can be an area of focus early on. I disagree with believing China is not worth it. I have ignored China to my peril. When playing Japan I select from 1 of the following 2 strategies:

1) India first with an early drive on China, secure south pacific islands and focus on Hawaii or Australia last for the win.

2) Cripple Australia first (staging on Caroline Islands) sweep to the south pacific islands choke off India and use minor factories to hold mainland victory cities. Capture Hawaii and Australia for the win, leaving India and W.US as the only allied cities.

I believe Japan has been given plenty of Infantry on mainland Asia to drive China into a manageable box, if not take them out. Many people have put forward the best ways to take India first, so I will focus on option 2, and address Jennifer's desired approach. I believe this is a harder approach to victory, but a viable choice.

This theory-craft is not tested, but is loosely based on other experiences, it is not my intent to make a blanket statement or imply certain success. Care should be taken when employing any strategy that is not well understood ,executed, or proven successful. Reader discretion is advised.

An early key to crippling Anzac is the 2 starting subs Japan begins the game with. I would suggest a starting purchase of 2 subs and 2 transports in addition to your starting fleet. I suspect you will want to keep the US neutral for 3 turns, so Anzac will have the opportunity to expand, however their NO's are tied to being at war, so they are likely to collect them once as Japan will be poised to cripple their economy swiftly.

From Caroline Islands, subs can reach convoy zones off of New South wales and Queensland. 3 subs will see Anzac brought to 5 IPCs, with 3 transports, New Zealand, W. Australia, and new Britain will remove 3 more IPCs and all NOs. Philippines, Celebes Islands and Java are all in range of Caroline Islands as well. By staging 6 or more transports loaded with units on Caroline Islands, Anzac will be forced to build land units and keep them in New South Wales.

Turn 1, the whole fleet should be moved to Caroline Islands and Paulau(ships that can't make Caroline). This threat of a turn 2 assault should keep Anzac from building navy. So to summarize on turn 3 or 4, when Japan spreads out from Caroline, Australia will be brought to 2 IPCs(+2 if they have Brazil), they get 3 if they manage to retake W. Australia. Taking New Britain keeps Anzac from having its island chain and original territories NO.

Staging the whole fleet on the Carolines will see the US pull its fleet back to W. US in all likelihood unless they are going Japan first. If New south wales can be taken with Hawaii by turn 7, you should still hold your starting cities and have a win.

Remember transports built in Japan can help you take Phillippines back from UK or in seizing Hawaii. If Anzac builds 3 units a turn, they will have 18 land units plus allied planes on turn 4. In theory, you can have your air force on Caroline by turn 3. They can land on New Zealand turn 4 if you capture it on turn 3 (grab Northwest territory or W. Australia too on turn 4 when you land air force), giving you range to hit New south wales with your whole air force and land on W or N. Australia by turn 5. (a few planes can be kept on Caroline to protect transports if they land on carriers off New South Wales). 3-6 loaded transports with your air force should be enough to take it on round 5 if this plan works. If you are not ready to take on turn 5 due to other air power needs, you will have choked off Anzacs wealth.

I envision most of Japan's builds being transports and land units maybe 1 or 2 complexes, India could go navy early on, but should not be able to destroy Japan's fleet. China will be fought with starting pieces, ignoring Russia will free up 12 more land units to drive on China with.

Just some food for thought. Comments anyone?
The Turn 1 buildup at Carolines sounds interesting, what would be your J1 Build and plans for reinforcing China, even with decent dice you will lose ground units.  Isn't closing and keeping closed the Burma road a high priority?
Logged
ThomasJefferson
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 28, 2011, 08:51:13 pm »
0

I am not by any means a pro, but my humble observation is that the single most important objective for Japan is securing the DEI turn 3.
Logged
Emperor Mollari
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*******
Posts: 28131


The Emperor has returned.


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 28, 2011, 08:57:26 pm »
0

I am not by any means a pro, but my humble observation is that the single most important objective for Japan is securing the DEI turn 3.

But if you take DEI turn 3, US can declare war beginning of Turn 3 instead of end of turn 3, with the new turn order (US follows Japan), you expose not only the pacific but Europe. Italy doesn't get to go until all the Western Allies (Except useless France) finish their turn. 
Logged
fanofbond
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 220


Only tell someone the rules when it favors me.


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 29, 2011, 05:46:38 am »
0

I think you underestimate the power of china.  IF played properly China with a little help from India can easily overwhellm Japans starting units by turn 4 or 5.  Then the US would have to be playing very poorly for your idea to work.  The US should have an equal or greater navy than Japan by turn 5 or 6.  Easily there in time to sit off Hawaii and threaten a good deal of Japans recent conquests.   
Logged
Fishmoto37
A&A.org Fighter
*
*
*
*
*****
Posts: 1070


Semper Fi


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 29, 2011, 06:09:55 am »
0

In our current game started yesterday I am playing the axis. We completed three rounds only because of lack of time. The Japanese are taking most of China and have taken one half of the DEI as well as the Philippines. Because of the Japanese having a large task force in the DEI area I have started to build up the navy in zone 6 as well. Expect to have most of China and all of DEI after round four to be played monday. It is important for Japan to have this income as well as building the navy in zone 6 because the U.S. will be coming. During the first three rounds the Indian navy has pulled back and the Soviets have not threatened Manchuria. Japan must keep adding to its navy in order to survive. The U.S. put a lot of assets into the Atlantic so they are not putting a lot of pressure on Japan in the Pacific. But with that huge income they will be coming!
« Last Edit: January 29, 2011, 11:37:21 am by Fishmoto37 » Logged
Cmdr Jennifer
Site Moderator
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 48267


League and Tournament Moderator


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 29, 2011, 08:56:57 am »
0

By "ignore China" I am more thinking along the lines of not heavily investing in China with the mindset to conquer the entire country - as I suspect most people play.

The 2 submarine, 2 transport open sounds very interesting.

Perhaps staging the fleet off the coast of Siam might be a very viable option.  The Carolines are nice, but I worry being that close to America's fleet.  Of course, if you pound Australia taking their capitol on Round 3, you would be far enough from the American fleet to negate them on Round 3.

I'll have to think on it.  Certain things appeal to me (the surprise factor for the first time you do it) the position of the ships.  Certain things worry me (having the attack forseen and countered before launched, having the fleet at a rather far distance from Tokyo...)
Logged
JamesAleman
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2261


Always looking for an opportunity to exploit.


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: January 29, 2011, 10:34:22 am »
0

Regarding my Australia first proposal, this is my plan for Asia:

Asia is not ignored, but as Jennifer stated, is not heavily invested in. When I stated that the starting forces should be able to manage China, the purpose was to concentrate forces in a few areas, trading vital objectives to slow China for the purpose of buying time (cheaply) to secure a mid game win. (turn 7-9)

One fact I noticed about the alpha 2 setup is that each Japanese held Chinese territory has at least 1 artillery on it:
Manchuria: 6 Infantry, 1 Mech Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 AA Gun, 2 Fighters, 2 Tac Bombers
Kiangsi: 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Shantung: 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Kwangsi: 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Jehol: 2 Infantry, 1 Artillery
Siam: 2 Infantry *
Kiangsu: 3 Infantry, 1 Artillery, 1 Fighter, 1 Tac Bomber.
Korea: 4 Infantry, 1 Fighter *
* are Japanese owned and controlled regions

This breaks down to 26 infantry, 6 artillery, and 1 mech for a total of 33 units vs China's 16 land units.
Lets assume China collects: 15, 12, 9, 9 (based on Japan trading Yunnan assumes China retakes each round)
China then produces at best 15 more units for a total of 31 land units vs 33 Japanese seems tight like you can manage China for at least the first 4 turns, before retreating to your victory cities. Granted India can lend units by declaring war early, this would affect your time table for containment.

Here is a detailed plan for the first 4 turns in Asia: I=infantry,A=artillery,M=Mechanized Infantry:
Turn 1 goals: Korea(4I) moves to Manchuria, Manchuria(6I,1A) to Jehol, Jehol (2I,1A)  to Chahar, Shantung(3I,1A) and Kiangsu(3I,1A) and Manchuria (1M) to Anhwe, Kiangsi(3I,1A) and Kwangsi(1I) to Hunan(2I), Kwansi (2I,1A) to Yunnan(4I) Use air round 1 to help, land in range of Japan for turn 2 move, then Caroline turn 3.
Turn 2 goals: Manchuria(4I) to Jehol, Chahar(2I,1A) to Suiyuyan, , Jehol(6I,1A) to Anhwe, Anhwe(1I,1M) to Hopei, Anhwe(5I,2A) to Kweichow, Hunan(2-3I,1A) to Yunnan(2-3I). Use 2 Bombers maybe, if you don't think they will be needed in Australia turn 5. Build Minor factory in Kiangsu.
Turn 3 goals: Jehol(4I) to Anhwe, Suiyuyan(2I,1A) to Kansu, Hopie(1I,1M) to Shensi, Kwechichow(5I,2A) to Szchewhan, Anhwe(6I,1A) to Kiangsi (these units are earmarked for Kwantung round 4 or retaking/reinforcing Kiangsu depending on India play)
Turn 4 goals: Anhwe(4I) to Kiangsu to defend factory or Kweichow if not needed, Kansu (2I,1A) to Tsinghai, Shensi(1I,1M) to Sikang, Kiangsi(1-6I,0-1A) to Kwangtung (need to take in force for city sake). Produce 2 mech and 1 armor for Kiangsu if needed, else 3 mech.

Obviously, this does not take into account your opponents responses. Planned play may vary based on individual game's needs. Reader discretion is advised. Problem areas turn 3, could be India involvement and China stacking in Szchewhan.

Out of pocket expenses for above, 12IPC turn 2, 9IPC turn 3, 14IPCs turn 4(minor factory,3 infantry, and 2mech/1tank) for a total spent of 35 IPCs. You could use transport instead depending on the pacific seas threats.

I believe that leaves Japan with enough income for Australia....just some more ideas to chew on. This is not a blanket statement of implied success, just a proposal on how you could contest Asia and keep China from ballooning too soon.
Logged
Cmdr Jennifer
Site Moderator
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 48267


League and Tournament Moderator


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: January 29, 2011, 10:41:33 am »
0

With the penalty for attacking Japan and the massive increase in defensive ability of Korea, I think I can see this being plausible.

Do not forget that Japan lost a transport in the Carolines in Alpha.  Makes a HUGE difference, for once, you cannot take Hawaii on J1 anymore! lol.

I do enjoy the idea of hitting ANZAC hard on J2 or J3.  For one, it changes it from the Allies having 5 nations between Japan and Italy to do to 4 nations. ^_^  Also, its cash.  Lets face it, with a reasonable sized Japanese navy around Australia, it is going to take some serious Allied aggression to liberate and with the extra income from minor China attacks, Australia and the southern Islands, maybe Japan can hold against a way too strong America.


I am still pondering a J1 jump on America.  It might liberate England/Anzac too much I am not sure. 
Logged
JamesAleman
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2261


Always looking for an opportunity to exploit.


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: January 29, 2011, 11:30:54 am »
0


I am still pondering a J1 jump on America.  It might liberate England/Anzac too much I am not sure. 

I am probably best know for my crazy America first plans (Operation Hollywood dates back to revised). I'm guessing that's why they changed the rules to permit US declaration of war if you are in Canada Smiley

With alpha knocking down the US to building a max of 27 pieces the first 3 rounds (unless they pay to upgrade minor factories) I will be drafting a US first approach. OOB it was possible to take Alberta with Germany and land the whole ��� airfoce for the purpose of getting to Europe by turn 4 or 5...can't remember.

It might be worth throwing Japan, Italy and Germany at the US if they can be taken out by turn 5....would be a tough game since China, Anzac, India and Russia would get large fast.

London would be contained with the 9 German transports off Gibraltar. So I do not see them getting into it by turn 4.

But this is a topic for another thread.

Logged
Fishmoto37
A&A.org Fighter
*
*
*
*
*****
Posts: 1070


Semper Fi


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 29, 2011, 11:53:03 am »
0

By "ignore China" I am more thinking along the lines of not heavily investing in China with the mindset to conquer the entire country - as I suspect most people play.

The 2 submarine, 2 transport open sounds very interesting.

Perhaps staging the fleet off the coast of Siam might be a very viable option.  The Carolines are nice, but I worry being that close to America's fleet.  Of course, if you pound Australia taking their capitol on Round 3, you would be far enough from the American fleet to negate them on Round 3.

I'll have to think on it.  Certain things appeal to me (the surprise factor for the first time you do it) the position of the ships.  Certain things worry me (having the attack forseen and countered before launched, having the fleet at a rather far distance from Tokyo...)
    If you take a large portion of the Japanese fleet more than one move from zone 6 then you must continue to add to the fleet in zone 6 with each purchase. If Japan puts all its resources into China and India then the U.S. will eventually overwhelm the axis in the Pacific. The Japanese must try to catch the U.S. fleet in a zone where they cannot be supported and then destroy them. I have seen this happen more than once. This will buy the axis time in the Pacfic as the U.S. will have to rebuild.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2017 Support Drive

Read about this support drive.
Support Level
Forum Username
Note: payee will appear as Livid Labs, LLC.
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]



Axis and Allies.org Official Gold Sponsor: Historical Board Gaming

Axis & Allies.org Official Silver Sponsor: Field Marchal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP © 2015 Livid Labs, LLC. All rights reserved.
Axis & Allies is registered trademark of Wizards of the Coast, a division of Hasbro, Inc.
Note: the copyright below is for the forum software only.
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!