May 20, 2013, 11:26:56 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Poll
Question: Is Germany strong enough in Alpha?
Yes, hard to win but possible - 6 (15.4%)
Yes, neither hard nor easy - 15 (38.5%)
Yes, easy to win - 3 (7.7%)
No, needs 1000 tanks in Poland - 2 (5.1%)
No, needs few more units - 13 (33.3%)
Total Voters: 36

Pages: « 1 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Germany strong enough in Alpha?  (Read 1283 times)
Fishmoto37
A&A.org Fighter
*
*
*
*
*****
Posts: 1061


Semper Fi


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2011, 05:28:17 pm »
0

That's been the basic order of purchases for the US just about every game we've played of the newest Alpha setup, and it works beautifully at slowing down and/or containing Japan.  It's a kickass setup to really bring some pain to Japan and I'm a huge fan of it.  But it's nowhere near ready on the Atlantic side to do much of anything but die, and then the US will need to spend its next two turns or so worth of IPC's to get its Atlantic fleet to the point where it can survive a German attack, and then another turn or two in order to have sufficient transports and men to begin dropping into Europe.  Which brings me back to my earlier statements, it's very tough for the US to exert any real pressure on Germany before its gobbled up enough of Russia that it can turn around and begin fending off Allied landings while trickling enough reinforcements to Barbarossa via Leningrad and Stalingrad to eventually take Moscow as well.  Once again, why does Germany need even more help?  This is just stacking the odds further and further in its favor.  I would like to draw attention again to the fact that these games were played without the +3 IPC bonus per territory gained in the initial Barbarossa turn, and yet Larry is looking at adding even more to Germany.  If anything, its Japan that ultimately needs the help.

Honestly the only way I've found for the US to make a real and lasting impact on the European side after a string of purchases like those you described was through helping the UK retake and hold Cairo while protecting London.
     Stand by Chompers, looks like we got a new Alpha+2 to deal with. Got to check out the changes.
Logged
chompers
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 133


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2011, 05:35:44 pm »
0

One step ahead of you.  More units for Germany, less for Russia, weaker US NO, and no more Anzac capturing the Carolines for the US, or UK/US threatening Berlin via seizing Denmark to open the straight.  Let me know if I missed anything major, I'm gonna go beat my head against the wall for a bit.

**edit** Russian Minor IC in Ukraine...interesting, and at least he removed the German initial Barbarossa territory grab N.O.  Overall though, seems to have strengthened the Axis slightly while weakening the Allies slightly.  I guess he went with what made the majority of players happy, can't say I blame him.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2011, 05:41:29 pm by chompers » Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!