May 21, 2013, 03:40:58 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: neutral armies  (Read 447 times)
Koningstiger
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 211


View Profile
« on: August 10, 2010, 01:56:08 am »
0

What always bewilders me with neutrals in a game is that the size of their armies tends to stay the same. I mean, the whole world is ablaze around them, so you would expect them to mobilize their forces. A very simple way of doing this would have been to add one infantry unit to each neutral each turn. How do you track this? Use a die to tell you which turn it is, so if you attack Greece on turn 3 and they start with 4 infantry they would now have 7 infantry.

Logged
Koningstiger
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 211


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2010, 02:22:59 am »
0

To add a bit more realism still and to prevent weird cases in which a minor neutral might end up having a larger army than one of the major powers would be to add caps to each nation:

Example: Sweden could never have more than 10 infantry, Turkey 15, Greece 7 etc. (symbolizing that all their forces have been mobilized)
Logged
LHoffman
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1440


Israeli Urban Warfare Counter-Terrorists


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2010, 03:31:02 am »
0

That all sounds good to me. Logical at least.

However, in this respect (neutral armies), I believe the game could be less realist and more playablility oriented. For this reason I like it the way it is. Always having a set amount of units to be mobilized for that territory is a little easier and more playable (for the main powers) than growing larger neutral armies as time goes on. After 2 or 3 turns under this new system, no one would ever invade a neutral.

Since neutrals don't matter as much as the other powers, I think it allows for more robust play to make them less of a roadblock as opposed to more of one. Somebody could argue that giving Neutrals more forces would cause players to avoid them and instead attack each other, therefore moving the heart of the game along... While this may be true for the most part, it still limits one of the more interesting aspects of the game. And while we still don't know how much use will be made of the neutral countries, it may be best to find out how their inclusion as a new element affects gameplay... and then decide whether or not to implement a modification like you have suggested. But that is only the way I will approach it at first. You may choose differently.

Interesting House Rule for sure though.
« Last Edit: August 10, 2010, 03:38:04 am by LHoffman » Logged
Flashman
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2043


Far too hard for Larry.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2010, 02:03:08 pm »
0

Even superpowers had a limit on the military establishment it could afford to maintain.

I don't like the idea of adding units to a small country not at war; however I think the assignment of units to the neutrals could have been more imaginative, for example giving the likes of Brazil and Spain small navies, or Sweden some armour.  But these should be a once only build.

Unless perhaps you'd like to give Sweden a minor complex.
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!