|
Emperor_Taiki
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2010, 12:38:30 pm » |
0
|
1-3: ditto what UN Spacy said 4. Once the US enters the war it can attack any axis country.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Emperor_Taiki
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: August 08, 2010, 12:39:18 pm » |
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UN Spacy
A&A.org Tank
  
Posts: 395
Imperium Axius Andus Alias
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: August 08, 2010, 12:54:15 pm » |
0
|
I'm not sure if you managed to catch it, so I'll ask again: did the Free French units help out the Allies in any way after France fell, or are they just smudges of blue on the map? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
panzerjager
A&A.org Artillery
 
Posts: 124
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: August 08, 2010, 12:58:53 pm » |
0
|
I noticed that a lot of the pics posted today appear to be of the opening setup. I also noticed the U.K. carrier has two fighters instead of 1 tactical bomber. So...
1. Are these pics not the opening setup?
2. Did y'all setup wrong?
3. Is the global setup different from Europe setup?
4. Are there misprints on the setup cards like in AAP1940?
Thanks for the previews and pics!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Emperor_Taiki
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: August 08, 2010, 01:06:42 pm » |
0
|
On turn one, germany is concerned with defeating france and sinking UK ships. the more air they commit to one mission they have less to commit to the other thus raising the chance of one failing or suffering signifigant causalties. The africa inf are pretty useless and just stop blitzs, the syria inf is useful for boltstering egypt. If you protect the french fleet on turn 1 they can be useful later in defeating Italy. I noticed that a lot of the pics posted today appear to be of the opening setup. I also noticed the U.K. carrier has two fighters instead of 1 tactical bomber. So...
1. Are these pics not the opening setup?
2. Did y'all setup wrong?
3. Is the global setup different from Europe setup?
4. Are there misprints on the setup cards like in AAP1940?
Thanks for the previews and pics!!!
lol, yah whoever did UK set it up wrong As far as I can tell there were no production errors.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 08, 2010, 01:09:42 pm by Emperor_Taiki »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gamerman01
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: August 08, 2010, 01:43:32 pm » |
0
|
More pics!
Nice. I like the one where the Russians control Korea!  It looks like it's a whole different ball game for UK East and ANZAC when you add Russia to the mix and the USA has the potential to build a lot more!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BadSpeller
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: August 08, 2010, 02:54:09 pm » |
0
|
In the game with the Plexiglas, it looks like Germany took UK.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
calvinhobbesliker
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: August 08, 2010, 05:16:07 pm » |
0
|
Did a game really happen where the soviets had a carrier and 8 battleships?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gamerman01
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: August 08, 2010, 06:28:13 pm » |
0
|
Did a game really happen where the soviets had a carrier and 8 battleships?
I think the red chip under the battleship was to show that it was damaged, not that there were 6 battleships.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
marechallannes
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: August 08, 2010, 06:40:11 pm » |
0
|
Good work, thanks. Question: There is no separate setup for the Global Game? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stoney229
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: August 08, 2010, 06:50:17 pm » |
0
|
Good work, thanks. Question: There is no separate setup for the Global Game?  there are a few minor additions - mainly 3 sets fo 6 infantry each in 3 of the eastern USSR territs. I think there's a couple infantry in just a couple other places.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Emperor_Taiki
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: August 08, 2010, 06:53:45 pm » |
0
|
Good work, thanks. Question: There is no separate setup for the Global Game?  +18 soviet inf on the pacific board, and one ANZAC inf in Egypt regarding the soviet fleet, yah thats a joke  . although the soviets can buy a carrier and a battleship on turn one in the global game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
calvinhobbesliker
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: August 08, 2010, 07:08:33 pm » |
0
|
Is it possible for the Brits to slow down Italay's African conquests?
Have you had a game where Italy invaded Syria or Jordan to get the 3 Iraq inf and attack Egypt from the rear?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hewhoisnickel
A&A.org Artillery
 
Posts: 125
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: August 08, 2010, 07:33:46 pm » |
0
|
Is it possible for the Brits to slow down Italay's African conquests?
Have you had a game where Italy invaded Syria or Jordan to get the 3 Iraq inf and attack Egypt from the rear?
I'm interested in both these things, as it seems, from what I've seen and heard, that Italy is hugely overpowered. It seems that if they put their mind to it, British/French Africa will fall no matter what.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cond1024
A&A.org Artillery
 
Posts: 168
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: August 08, 2010, 07:50:34 pm » |
0
|
Quick rules question for you, are subs able to pass through enemy controlled straits?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|