June 19, 2013, 12:32:52 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Poll
Question: witch one(s) do you want
t-72(oops cold war)
kv-1
kv-2
is-2
is-3
other
isu-122
t-34

Pages: « 1 2
  Print  
Author Topic: FMG russian TANK  (Read 1609 times)
Fishmoto37
A&A.org Fighter
*
*
*
*
*****
Posts: 1063


Semper Fi


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2010, 04:22:22 am »
0

hol-e carp that thing is beast!
       What kind of fish is a hol-e carp? I thought you all were talking Russian tanks.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2010, 04:24:06 am by Fishmoto37 » Logged
Emperor_Taiki
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1245


"The state reigns and tells us what is true"


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2010, 06:27:27 am »
0

?
Logged
knp7765
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1932


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2010, 03:26:29 pm »
0

I vote for the KV-1 and the T-26
Logged
reloader-1
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 929


Historical Board Gaming Representative


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2010, 03:43:24 pm »
0

I really want the T-26 as well.
Logged
knp7765
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1932


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: September 12, 2010, 03:53:58 pm »
0

I know the current versions of A&A don't allow for tanks for China, but if anyone wanted to make it possible for China to get a few tanks you could use the T-26 for China as well.  Early in the war, the Chinese had a number of T-26s they got from Russia.  I don't think they lasted very long though.
Logged
DrLarsen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 499


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 12, 2010, 03:58:45 pm »
0

I'm stunned! STUNNED I TELL YOU!  huh

I can't believe the KV-1 is beating the IS-2 in this poll!  The IS-2 was built in larger numbers, is a closer match to the iconic German Tiger (as well as to the American Pershing which easily COULD HAVE been built in larger numbers if the American planners had been wiser)

The Soviets stopped production on the KV-1 tanks before it had really revved up because it failed to have any better firepower than the T-34 it was supposed to be heavier than!

I don't think this is even a tough call, actually: IS-2 for the heavy, a T-34/85 for the medium (as it gives FMG an iconic T-34 that is still an upgrade from the WotC model and an IS-2 for an additional upgrade beyond that... the KV-1 isn't even an upgrade over the T-34/76!)
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13695


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: September 12, 2010, 04:04:43 pm »
0

KV-1 is a real tank that fought. IS-3 was so late in the game it didn't matter is really is a post war tank.

No need to take the one time it fought in the last weeks of the war and dignify it as the iconic heavy Soviet tank. KV-1 earned this in battle.
Logged
DrLarsen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 499


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 12, 2010, 04:11:10 pm »
0

What are you talking about?  I'm talking about the IS-2, not the IS-3!
Logged
DrLarsen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 499


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: September 12, 2010, 04:34:06 pm »
0

The KV-1 had pretty much nothing to bring to the table that the T-34 didn't have, and was much more expensive, so much so that the Soviets nearly killed their heavy tank program altogether in 1942.  The KV-1 had been pretty much relegated to an "infantry-support" role (...like the British Matilda, and the Brits other "infantry tanks" rolleyes...) by then.  Then the new generation of German heavies and heavy-mediums (i.e., Tigers and Panthers) started to make their presence felt.  The IS-2 (AKA JS-2) was basically the Russian answer to the Tiger (while the T-34/85 was basically the Russian answer to the Panther.)  The IS-2 was fielded in larger numbers than either its predecessor (the KV-1) or its direct competitor (the Tiger).  With perhaps very few exceptions, the last heavy tank units had re-equipped with IS-2 by mid-1944, right about the time that the Americans and Brits were finally encountering Panthers and Tigers for the first time in France.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2010, 11:28:56 am by DrLarsen » Logged
knp7765
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1932


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: September 13, 2010, 08:02:18 am »
0

Please excuse my ignorance, but is there a difference between the IS-2 and the JS-2?
Logged
DrLarsen
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 499


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: September 13, 2010, 10:23:17 am »
0

No, sorry, same thing; it's sometimes spelled one way and sometimes the other.  I'm trying to get used to spelling it IS-2, but I'm used to spelling it JS-2.

It stands for "Joseph Stalin 2" (in standard English romanization) which is also spelled Iosef Stalin in a more literal/accurate romanization, I believe.  Either way, "ole Joe Stalin" is the same person and the second model of tank named after him is the same tank.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!