June 17, 2013, 08:47:42 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Poll
Question: Which war is the most exciting to study.  (Voting closes: December 31, 1969, 03:59:59 pm)
Napoleonic Wars - 3 (5.7%)
World War I - 5 (9.4%)
World War II - 30 (56.6%)
Cold War - 3 (5.7%)
War on Terrorism - 1 (1.9%)
War of 1812 - 1 (1.9%)
Civil War - 4 (7.5%)
Other - 6 (11.3%)
Total Voters: 53

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Which war is the most exciting to learn about  (Read 2562 times)
eggsaladsandwich
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 30


Organizer of Portland Axis and Allies Meetup Grp.


View Profile
« Reply #75 on: August 08, 2010, 01:11:00 am »
0

Cold war baby! How close we came to actually throwing nukes at each other will always fascinate me. My second choice would have been the "Star Wars" between the Star Trekkers and the Star Wars fans at Comic con that one year. afro
Logged
allboxcars
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 724


Bellum omnium contra omnes (SPNBS)


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: August 09, 2010, 06:07:55 am »
0

"Carthage must be destroyed!"- Cato the Elder

And thus the soundbite was invented..

#726
Logged
ABWorsham
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1764


How much is your integrity worth?


View Profile
« Reply #77 on: August 09, 2010, 07:01:10 pm »
0

Punic Wars. They determined control of the Mediterranean and cemented Rome's prime position for 600 years to come.

"Carthage must be destroyed!"- Cato the Elder

Before there was Ali vs Frasier, there was Rome vs Carthage.
Logged
GrizzlyMan
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 164


The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave


View Profile
« Reply #78 on: August 24, 2010, 01:20:43 pm »
0

Quote
Next thing you know people on the street will say "Carthage must be destroyed!"

I sometimes say it to people on the street. It's in the signature of all of my e-mails (and my AAA.org posts).

Another interesting war is the Greek and Persian wars. Themistocles and Leonidas are really interesting. I don't know why but all of those ancient Mediterranean wars were really cool.
Logged
Cromwell_Dude
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 630


Live and Let Live...Prime Time Stars and Bars


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: April 30, 2012, 06:39:55 pm »
0

For me, what now has become known as the American Civil War.
Logged
empireman
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 684


hehe- tech roll success


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: April 30, 2012, 10:24:13 pm »
0

WW2, Cold war, War of Terror, Vietnam War, Korean War, and Middle eastern war all lead back to World war 1. Just think about it.

But I like WW2. BIGGEST WAR OF ALL TIME! Thats why A&A exists
Logged
Deaths Head 420
The Mini's Mod.
Site Moderator
A&A.org Submarine
*
****
Posts: 671


Sealion will go forth and England will fall !!


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: May 17, 2012, 01:46:59 pm »
0

As much rich history there is in Both Modern World Wars, I had to vote other. The reason is, I find the Vietnam War the most interesting because a Jungle dwelling 3rd world Nation Beat down and kicked around a modern Super power, using nothing more then AK -47's, the jungle, and a few modern weapons supplied from out side influences.

One has to ask them selves, how does a nation that has to import all it's weapons, compete with and win a fight against a country with a arsenal of weapons that includes Nuclear power and Nukes.  I just don't get it... 

I understand the politics and politicians involved are a huge reason why the US lost that war.  It surely was not the fighting will of the men involved or the equipment they used, but more when they(the Soldiers) were allowed and how to use said weapons. 

Even by reading and or watching the book/movie we were soldiers, seeing how 375 US troops could fight off 4000 NVA is remarkable, but never the less makes that conflict more interesting then ever
Logged
CWO Marc
A&A.org Destroyer
*
*
*
*
*****
Posts: 1642


View Profile
« Reply #82 on: May 17, 2012, 03:31:49 pm »
0

I find the Vietnam War the most interesting because a Jungle dwelling 3rd world Nation Beat down and kicked around a modern Super power, using nothing more then AK -47's, the jungle, and a few modern weapons supplied from out side influences. One has to ask them selves, how does a nation that has to import all it's weapons, compete with and win a fight against a country with a arsenal of weapons that includes Nuclear power and Nukes.  I just don't get it... 

There are actually a few parallels between the Vietnam War and the American Revolutionary War.  In both cases, a major power was fighting a war across thousands of miles of ocean, using a large regular army optimized for action on a conventional battlefield, against a somewhat ragtag group (at least initially) of local inhabitants who were fighting for independence and freedom from foreign colonial domination, and who made up for their material deficiencies in part by using irregular tactics and by exploiting their detailed knowledge of their home terrain.  In a way it's odd that the Americans, who won the Revolutionary War in the way I've described, didn't seem to catch on to the fact that they were facing a similar situation in reverse during the Vietnam War.

Logged
Gargantua
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 10818


AA.org's Villain


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: May 17, 2012, 05:29:15 pm »
0

The parallel isn't the battlefield.

It's the homefront.

Both wars were lost at home.
Logged
Deaths Head 420
The Mini's Mod.
Site Moderator
A&A.org Submarine
*
****
Posts: 671


Sealion will go forth and England will fall !!


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: May 18, 2012, 11:13:27 am »
0

ok, then why did we at least get an cease fire out of Korea? That is also thousands miles from home. And it doesnt take 3 months to get there like the revolutionary war under British Sail power.  I think US politicians were p����'s and did not want to bomb Hanoi into submission like they could have if they would have stuck to their guns(bombs) as they say.  I think the US could have won southern Vietnams independence if we were not always fighting with one hand tied behind their backs.

Maybe even a direct land invasion in the North from the Sea could have won that conflict. go right for Hanoi from the get go, get rid of Ho Chi Mihn and see what happens. Let the Northern peoples see what a Democracy could do for their country.

Iraq is still a mess, but its in better shape without Saddam, Could the same be said for Vietnam?
Logged
Gargantua
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 10818


AA.org's Villain


View Profile
« Reply #85 on: May 18, 2012, 11:45:37 am »
0

Again, the Ceasefire was because there wasn't enough political will to finish the job.

That's pretty obvious, otherwise the US would have nuked china, like General Mac wanted to, and you would have ended the conflict.

War lost at home, not in the field.
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13690


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #86 on: May 18, 2012, 09:32:52 pm »
0

...otherwise the US would have nuked china, like General Mac wanted to, and you would have ended the conflict.

Yes ended that conflict and started WW3 with Russia, China's ally at the time
Logged
aequitas et veritas
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 496


3:16


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: May 19, 2012, 05:16:14 am »
0

What WW3?...Just because the U.S. was involved does not neccesariily mean it is another WW...I would call it rather a conflict between a Superpower and a greater Power...other then that ,it is that we are in round Huh of World Wars...
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13690


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: May 19, 2012, 08:21:04 am »
0

Just because USA nukes China and USSR NUKES USA and USA and NATO NUKE USSR and WARSAW Pact invades western Europe.... does not mean WW3?

What does killing 75% of the worlds population across the globe mean?

Population control?
Logged
aequitas et veritas
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 496


3:16


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: May 19, 2012, 11:03:11 am »
0

Just because USA nukes China and USSR NUKES USA and USA and NATO NUKE USSR and WARSAW Pact invades western Europe.... does not mean WW3?

What does killing 75% of the worlds population across the globe mean?

Population control?

That doesn´t justifies a World War if the parties involved only threatning each other!

as long as there is no actual Killing there is no World War , I´m not ignoring the present World wide situation, just trying to be realistic...I agree that there is a hidden War out there but Not a World War...According to the peresnt type of Flag the U.S. shows, she is still at war, but the Federal Russian flag shows a diffrent one.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!