@Imperious:
no not you guys. You post more than one sentence and though often you’re off topic at least its not a post like this:
“agreed”
“I just still think its good”
" I just want to know that its possible"
“I am not sure what i think of that,so what do you think”
…… none of this leads to conversation on these boards…
Actually I think that the above four examples are perfectly normal “conversation” and one should be surprised if they didn’t appear in a forum. It is after all an exchange between people and social conventions demand responses even when there’s no new information to add. Not saying it makes for stellar reading but I don’t think the above four examples are dysfunctional, ignorant or odd. Especially in the absence of any system of voting support for a person’s position or disagreement.
Furthermore, not every posting can be a lengthy diatribe with wiki quotes, links, house rules etc.
Nor should it be.
How a lengthier message to express the same sentiments listed above would be superior is beyond me. You’d think that being succinct enough to express yourself in a single line would be applauded rather than jeered at.
Anyway, IMTO (since someone should get back on topic), I hope that the American capture of Canadian territory in the above Pacific scenario will not be maintained in the Global version where there’s London in play. (I know that’s only a single sentence but… do you want me to stutter?)
#566