May 22, 2013, 09:47:04 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
  Print  
Author Topic: American split income?  (Read 9047 times)
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #105 on: January 15, 2010, 06:27:42 am »
0

No country would have the resilience to keep fighting after they had a few A-bombs dropped on them.
Logged
allboxcars
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 724


Bellum omnium contra omnes (SPNBS)


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: January 15, 2010, 06:40:57 am »
0

I dunno.
I think given the inability to put boots on the ground in Europe or mount a concentrated SBR campaign, and having depleted their entire Atomic arsenal of two, the US would have had ended up on the receiving end of the Germans' huge stockpile of weaponized chemicals.  

That is if they bothered with Germany at all. (Which begs the question of what was the fate of the Allies they never had in this counterfactual scenario, I presume conquest before American DOW.)
« Last Edit: January 15, 2010, 06:43:06 am by allboxcars » Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #107 on: January 15, 2010, 06:51:36 am »
0

Well the US didn't have to put boots on ground in Japan. Now did they?
Logged
allboxcars
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 724


Bellum omnium contra omnes (SPNBS)


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: January 15, 2010, 07:00:22 am »
0

Well the US didn't have to put boots on ground in Japan. Now did they?

Actually they did have to put boots on the ground, island by island right up to the Home Islands, until it was quite clear that both them and the Russians were on the doorstep of Japan itself.

Lobbing bombs across an ocean didn't end the war. Douhet was wrong.

And this of course, was not done without some brave Allies keeping the road to India and New Guinea etc. in Allied hands.

I just think that the US would have executed a more difficult KJF campaign - driven by that Day of Infamy.  But if Hitler had been left with a free hand to handle Europe, once UK is Neutral or Nazi, and Moscow has fallen... I dunno, say 1944.. then it's too late for the US to take on the Germans from across the Atlantic.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2010, 07:07:52 am by allboxcars » Logged
Subotai
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1259



View Profile
« Reply #109 on: January 15, 2010, 11:29:28 am »
0

If UK and Russia was captured before US sent many troops to Europe, I think the US would not go to war against Germany, only defend their home waters, and eventually secure south America, and capture Japan.

For Germany's sake, this had to happen before, or sometime during 1942, b/c then the war was lost for Germany.

It is ofc very possible that nukes against Germany could be an option, but even today, you need troops on the ground, or at least be 99% certain that your enemy knows that you're willing to put troops on the ground, like the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia.
It wasn't until Milosevic thought that NATO would send in ground troops that he conceded, even if he (Serbia) had lost before the war started. 



Logged
allboxcars
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 724


Bellum omnium contra omnes (SPNBS)


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: January 15, 2010, 11:57:38 am »
0

For Germany's sake, this had to happen before, or sometime during 1942, b/c then the war was lost for Germany.



I was throwing 1944 out there... presuming Barbarossa is delayed maybe by a year for Sea Lion or something else to take the British out of the fight, and then the Soviet defense / counter-offensive being entirely re-written owing to Lend-Lease never occurring.

Admittedly this "America goes it alone" scenario is a major counter-factual.
[Note: this scenario was not my idea tongue]
« Last Edit: January 15, 2010, 12:00:29 pm by allboxcars » Logged
allboxcars
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 724


Bellum omnium contra omnes (SPNBS)


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: January 15, 2010, 12:44:31 pm »
0

Anyway, back on subject: I'm not a fan of the US economy being split by rule. 
I think it should end up split by compelling circumstances and player choice.

Mind you, this is obviously open to abuse thru really gamey decisions... but if players want that kind of experience then what can you do? wink
Logged
SgtBlitz
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2482


Man, this was a .gif, but now there's no joke.


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: January 15, 2010, 07:21:19 pm »
0

I look at A&A as a 2 player game so I couldn't care less about an individual country being the winner.
Really? I find it much more fun with all the spots filled.

LOL.  Argh, multiplayer is fun (especially on TripleA) until you find out you're having to play the clueless guy's turn for him/her anyway.  If I ever get to play multiplayer AA50 in real life with 6 people (hard to do with all the friends halfway across the country) I just suggest stuff and let them decide.  Usually you just watch as they flounder around a few turns and you end up bailing them out on what to do.  It's hard to have a learner's curve on a game you play once a year.  I have horrible luck with the dice when it comes to the pivotable battles, so always let the other guys on your team roll, less stress that way.
Logged
xzorn
A&A.org Mechanized Infantry
**
Posts: 89



View Profile
« Reply #113 on: January 15, 2010, 07:47:50 pm »
0

I think that in the event of a US v Japan and Germ conflict in reality, the US might have been able to take out Japan, but getting enough men into Europe to defeat the entirety of Germany would be a longshot. In the end, I think it would be a number of inconclusive naval skirmishes, some angry glares, and then some sort of peace agreement.
Logged
Subotai
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1259



View Profile
« Reply #114 on: January 16, 2010, 06:20:17 am »
0

As for the question of American split income, it is obvious that this is a very bad idea. A&A has not had scripted play mechanisms in any of the global games.

Better to make the pacific islands worth so much that both Japan and US must fight in the pac, or lose a lot of money.

Like Hawaii worth 5 ipc, and maybe even more, including NOs.

Logged
Frontovik
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 616



View Profile
« Reply #115 on: January 16, 2010, 07:12:59 am »
0

i think it's combined income
if japan succeeds to conquer pacific, game is over, which will happen if US does nothing
Logged
molinar13
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 255



View Profile
« Reply #116 on: January 16, 2010, 09:22:40 am »
0

If its not combined income then I hope the U.K. and Russia can hold their own.
Logged
WILD BILL
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1372


View Profile
« Reply #117 on: January 16, 2010, 12:49:09 pm »
0

I wonder if split incomes also means split capitals for the US. I know loosing Washington doesn't happen to often  but would you also give up the west coast $ ?
Logged
democratic leader
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 158



View Profile
« Reply #118 on: January 16, 2010, 04:10:55 pm »
0

Quote
Exactly WW2 had ZERO teamwork with these exceptions:

UK and USA in Europe

Germany tells Italy what to do because they pay their bills.

The Soviets didn't trust anybody

The British didn't trust the Soviets

Italy just wanted the trains to run on time, and the have a large lake known as the Mediterranean.

Spain wanted to be on the winning side after it won

USA just wanted to keep Democracy alive after 1945

Japan wanted its own dominion in the pacific

Germany wanted a free hand in Europe

Finland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungry all wanted parts of western Russia for farming and lucrative contracts from the Reich.


This forgets the greatest (not most powerful) allience in world war 2. Was between AUS and the US. We were scared stiff of been invaided by Japan, the UK had sent most of or forces to africa and the rest to Singapor, along with all the navy to the Med and left us for dead after Pearl Harbour after we gave them everything.

MacCather came along, and with it tons of US forces and planes and gave real leadership to us. The US were not afraid of giving Aus all we needed because we were not a compeating power, and in return we put all our forces under US command.

We won Coral Sea, held liberate to Phillipans and ended up capturing Bereno.

And to this day we are still one of your greatest allies.
Logged
Frontovik
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 616



View Profile
« Reply #119 on: January 17, 2010, 08:03:15 am »
0

i still think russia will have a zillion infantryn so germans can never take moscow and US can go to pacific
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!