May 25, 2013, 04:28:21 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Operation Sealion a Possibility with AA1940 Europe?  (Read 12551 times)
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #165 on: October 24, 2009, 11:10:38 pm »
0

You could be right
Logged
Krupp Steel
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 195


Tin=Next of Kin


View Profile
« Reply #166 on: November 21, 2009, 04:07:16 pm »
0

What about the inclusion of Airbases now?
The Germans could shuttle across 4 Inf, if the English Channel and mainland is within 3. Plus whatever naval invasion forces they can muster.
Idk, just something I thought of while reading something over at LARRY'S site about the airbases.
This Sealion would have to be second or third turn,depends how long France can last.
Logged
WILD BILL
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1375


View Profile
« Reply #167 on: November 27, 2009, 08:32:31 pm »
0

Krump Steel, you must be referring to paratroopers. Germany would have to get a pretty lucky tech roll rd 1 or rd2, then I would say sea lion is a definite possibility. If you got paratroopers early and get to use them the round you get the tech (like AA50) then yea it could be like a sneak attack catching the UK off guard.

That and a bit of naval build-up for bombardment, and more inf via transport with out tipping you hand. Germany should also start with a decent size air force to take on the Britts head to head. You should also still get the +1 ftr & tac bmr bonus too. Another thing to think about is the UK is an island and should start with an air base. It could use some of its island based air force to defend its waters, so what ever you bring via navy could be in store for a pretty good fight.

I would still attack Paris first with Germany, maybe leave the mop up to Italy. Then if your in range go for it. Especially if The UK fails to protect itself, or make good use of its navy.
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #168 on: January 29, 2010, 07:42:05 pm »
0

Ah yes, here it is idk_iam_swiss. Let's talk about Sea Lion in the proper thread.
Logged
SgtBlitz
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2482


Man, this was a .gif, but now there's no joke.


View Profile
« Reply #169 on: January 30, 2010, 03:04:54 pm »
0

Probably added this to the end of the wrong thread:

Quote
LOL, now you're wanting to go attack England now instead of Russia (before or after finishing off France?).  There was some other thread about dividing up England during Sealion since it will be two territories now:

http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=16471.0

I still think Sealion is an utter waste of time most games, but if you can catch unexperienced Allied players off guard it can be successful (i.e., this only works ONCE on the beginning players, I'm sure an exp. UK player can see it coming a mile away).  Perhaps if Russia is prevented from invading Germany till Round 3, (with a reduced income rule like the US as a neutral before entering the war) could this be possible, and it would still be incredibly risky so early in the game.  You would probably only get one shot at it by building all trans and a carrier in the Baltic round 1, with the invasion on round 2 before England can really build enough land units to make it completely improbable (also before the US enters the war/has reinforcements in range).  I'm guessing 3 loaded transports, with 4 planes and a bomber as air cover would be all Germany would be capable of Round 2, IF Britain hasn't already damaged/sunk the Baltic fleet and/or blocked the Channel with a sizeable navy stack.  Even if Britain went 100% ground defense instead (4-5 inf, 3 arm, 1 fig build on round 1), I'm sure the defending army will be at least equal in number to the invading units Germany has, with odds AND AA gun hits in its favor.

Bah, forget it, you will see the same dillema the OKW came to when Sealion became a possibility after the Fall of France, its just not worth risking all the war material when there are easier fish to fry in Europe.  Better to isolate and destroy British holdings elsewhere to weaken it to a surrender-able level.

Plus, by not spending your round 1 ipcs on navy, you'd be reinforcing your armies for eventually invading Russia and defending the continent from the UK.

Also, if we're not playing with take-capital-take-all-IPCs rules, its definitely not worth the risk.  It may not even be worth the risk if you're going to seize it for only one round's worth of IPCs, and lose multiple fighters in the process.  The surviving UK navy will just take it back with land units from Canada on UK's turn.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2010, 03:06:49 pm by SgtBlitz » Logged
SgtBlitz
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2482


Man, this was a .gif, but now there's no joke.


View Profile
« Reply #170 on: February 05, 2010, 04:13:47 pm »
0

Hmm, actually now that its confirmed that the US isn't a split income (and will have crazy unbalanced mounds of IPCs to throw at either front), a turn 2 Sealion KO attempt with Germany doesn't seem that bad of an option at all.  Looks like this might be the ONLY viable strategy if the US turns out to be a 100+ IPC juggernaut with NOs.

How in the hell can Japan even provide a counterweight against a combined income US like this???  It would take 3-4 turns of Japan navy builds to even ATTEMPT to invade W. USA, out of which 100 IPCs going into ground forces can stop at the drop of a hat.

Guess WOTC wants a new name for the global game of AA1940:  TEAM AMERICA: WORLD POLICE!  "TEAM AMERICA!!! *%^@ YEAH!!!"
Logged
maverick_76
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 642


Eye of the Tiger


View Profile
« Reply #171 on: February 05, 2010, 05:39:06 pm »
0

Remember that the industrial complexes are capped. So only 10 units per turn can be produced, no matter how much moolah you have.
Logged
idk_iam_swiss
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 699



View Profile
« Reply #172 on: February 05, 2010, 05:50:20 pm »
0

trust me youll run out or money that wont be an issue
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #173 on: February 05, 2010, 08:45:21 pm »
0

If UK is the country with the split income, they will only have a partial income to fend off the Germans.
Logged
idk_iam_swiss
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 699



View Profile
« Reply #174 on: February 06, 2010, 10:43:32 am »
0

Or you can just spend all your combined income in one theatre
Logged
RogertheShrubber
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 212


I arrange, design, and sell shrubberies


View Profile
« Reply #175 on: February 06, 2010, 11:17:26 am »
0

10 IPC US build, 10 fighters in one round!  Thats awesome.  Not to say that would be a sound buy depending on what the situation is, but something to think about if japan even attempts to point the bows of her ships towards the US coast.   
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #176 on: February 06, 2010, 06:07:38 pm »
0

10 IPC US build, 10 fighters in one round!  Thats awesome.  Not to say that would be a sound buy depending on what the situation is, but something to think about if japan even attempts to point the bows of her ships towards the US coast.   

Soounds like what happened at Midway.
Logged
SgtBlitz
A&A.org Bomber
*****
Posts: 2482


Man, this was a .gif, but now there's no joke.


View Profile
« Reply #177 on: February 06, 2010, 07:34:32 pm »
0

Yeah, 10 fighters one round, anyone else think that could possibly unbalance the game?  Oh well, I think IPC counts are increased overall anyways in 1940.

Though Brain Damaged has a great point, if UK is the country with split income, then Sealion looks even more tempting after all.
Logged
Brain Damaged
Guest
« Reply #178 on: February 07, 2010, 01:46:39 pm »
0

Yeah UK will only be able to defend England with a portion of their income.
Logged
Gwlachmai
A&A.org Submarine
****
Posts: 664


View Profile
« Reply #179 on: February 08, 2010, 09:22:01 am »
0

   I would think that a combined US income might provide a bit of incentive to keep Japan from making a J1 attack in the Pacific. Especially in light of potentially giving the US a 60-70 IPC income boost. I can't wait to try the combined game. The only real debate with my gaming group is do we play Europe alone a few times first or just jump right in.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!