November 25, 2014, 05:21:21 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Help support TripleA software development. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register AACalc  
Loading
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Island hoping. US Pacific Strategy  (Read 1103 times)
rpv173
A&A.org Infantry
*
Posts: 24


View Profile
« on: December 23, 2008, 04:18:29 pm »
0

Does anyone do this strategy. Is it worth it? What's everyones strategy for the pacific?
Logged
tin_snips
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 285



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2008, 04:44:33 pm »
0

i think it's more viable in the 1942 setup, but it does depend on what the japanese fleet is doing in any case
Logged
Funcioneta
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*******
Posts: 12858


AA50 '42 2010 League Champion


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2008, 12:04:22 am »
0

In Revised, there were two paths: massing ships in Alaska, then attack Japan home islands or my favourite: make a defensive fleet and pick Dutch East Indies and Philippines, then build a IC in Borneo or East Indies and then shift to build attack ships.

In AA50, Alaska fleet is the same, but now Dutch East Indies revert to UK, so you cannot build IC there. This leaves you with Philippines as only option for IC (China reverts to China and FIC is usually too well defended), so you must build BB there (2 IPCs value of phi). Still, Philippines is too near from Japan, so is more difficult taking and holding it than Dutch East Indies.

A interesting new feature is that you can sneak subs to annoy lonely trannies and small fleets: while there is no dd in range, they are safe from air strikes or even naval strikes. ACs are still very good, have at least 2 of them, and also as many bbs as Japan (or they will strafe your fleets).
Logged
a44bigdog
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*******
Posts: 15365



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2008, 09:29:14 am »
0

Carriers also keep Japan "honest" in that with the consolidation of the two sea zones at Japan they now no longer have a "safe"  seazone to park unescorted transports in.
Logged
U-505
2007 AAR League
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*******
Posts: 11383


Rollin' hard, Rollin' fast, Rollin' by


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2008, 12:18:22 pm »
0

What the designers did was break up the big Japanese sea zones into a lot of little ones but they left the sea zones close to the US wide open which encourages a policy of harrassment by a smaller US navy. But, the US is unlikely to make it very deep into Japanese controlled sea zones without spending every dime on the Pacific.

However, with a small naval investment the US can usually claim the Midway, Wake, Hawaii, Solomans National Objective and keep a decent portion of the Japanese navy tied up.
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2014 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Note: payee will appear as Livid Labs, LLC.
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]



Axis and Allies.org Official Gold Sponsor: Field Marshal Games

Axis & Allies.org Official Silver Sponsor: Historical Board Gaming
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP © 2014 Livid Labs, LLC. All rights reserved.
Axis & Allies is registered trademark of Wizards of the Coast, a division of Hasbro, Inc.
Note: the copyright below is for the forum software only.
Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!