IC in Norway for Germany?

[Nix]

Norway is very difficult to take back if lost.  The Allies could take it and keep it.

But 2 rtrn, and ac g1, then it will be hard for Brits to hold norway.


in 1941 norway finnland is a "worse" place for uk/usa to funnel troops to due to the additional distance to go towards germany,. also since trn´s no longer works as cover, it´s harder to keep a fleeet alive for uk/usa.

So it´t´s viable but not neccesary since german ic works better, and i would agree a Ic in france would work better, but i would rather put one in balkans thought,  sió germany can put so e troops into africa if needed.

[Comassion]

Norway is very difficult to take back if lost.  The Allies could take it and keep it.

But 2 rtrn, and ac g1, then it will be hard for Brits to hold norway.

So you'd hold it (maybe - UK can build more planes in response), but this is becoming a very costly endeavor.  That's 41 IPCs worth of income for the IC and ships. 

You're pitting Germany's income more directly against the UK's, a fight which Germany could potentially win, except that Russia is going to have a big edge in the Eastern Front.