June 18, 2013, 09:07:00 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Do you live near Cincinnati? Join us this weekend for A&A Spring Gathering XI on April 5-6, 2013. Search me
  Articles  
   Home   Help Login Register Chat  
Loading
Poll
Question: What is your favorite WW2 fighter.
Me-109
P-51
Yak-9
A6M Zero
Spitfire
Fw-190
Typhoon
Hawker Hurricane
p-38
P-39
P-47
Lag-3
the Hellcat
F-4 Wildcat
Ki-43 Oscar
the Corsair
Me-262
Mosquito
P-40

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Favorite WW2 Fighter Plane  (Read 5660 times)
Aretaku
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 178



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: November 13, 2008, 01:29:40 am »
0

I voted for the P-38 first. Love the design, and it was the aircraft that killed Yamamoto, so it gets bonus points.

Voted for the Mosquito second...possibly the best bang for the buck of any WWII aircraft, and a superb night-aircraft.
Logged
italiansarecoming
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 453


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: November 13, 2008, 03:32:03 pm »
0

interesting someone voted for the hellcat i am guessing because there is no love for the pacific(those japanese had no chance at late 1943 sigh)

Anyways the me is really high now.
Logged
LT04
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1250


10th MTN DIV


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: November 21, 2008, 08:54:06 am »
0

I thought that this was a good place for this link about a Mustang.  Enjoy...

http://www.grayeagles.org/video.htm
Logged
d142
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1073



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: November 21, 2008, 11:58:47 am »
0

i voted for the spitfire. it is the one i remember the most from watching wwII movies, the spitfires were always out numbered and out gunned, and when the RAF got the warning of the messerschmit's imminent arrival to britain they would be in the air shooting down the nazi aircraft 10-1. i dont know if that is exactly true though smiley

Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13694


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: November 21, 2008, 01:37:56 pm »
0

not 10 to 1, more like 2.5 to 1

better pilots, Radar giving early warning, and bombing in daylight.

Germans should have just sent in fighters to raid airfields and engage fighters. Bombers should have came over only in night.

The loses are mainly bombers and stukas
Logged
d142
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1073



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: November 22, 2008, 12:15:18 pm »
0

yeah, around 2:1 is more accurate, i was looking at some stats for the battle of britain losses, luftwaffe 1750 losses, RAF 900 losses, not counting the blitz.
Logged
ABWorsham
A&A.org Destroyer
*****
Posts: 1767


How much is your integrity worth?


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: November 23, 2008, 09:42:55 am »
0

The German's lack of a modern escort fighter was a huge set back in the Battle of Britain. The Me-110 was a complete failure at this job. The Me-109 was a great fighter, however, it was an interceptor not an escort fighter.

Logged
d142
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1073



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: November 24, 2008, 05:21:32 am »
0

yeah, the BF-110 was that bad they needed a fighter escort on on their escort missions.

http://www.military-aircraft.org.uk/ww2-fighter-planes/

some great information and pictures of wwII aircraft here.
Logged
italiansarecoming
A&A.org Tank
***
Posts: 453


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: November 25, 2008, 03:30:05 pm »
0

All i can say is that somtimes more is better as the luftwaffe could have won but they stopped bombing airfileds so this gave the allies a chance to get airfields sending planes.  1 thing what i like abotu when i play is bombing 2 airfactories both of them which they have it will take 5 turns to get 2 new ones and that is if not buying any tanks/men/ships since u can't buy planes until turn 3 ofincome it is brilliant and germany maybe loses 10 fighters out of 50


This stops the allies from an ealry d-day which is 1 of the only flaws in this
Logged
Obergruppenfuhrer
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 213


"Courage is my honour" Shutz Staffel


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: November 26, 2008, 09:45:19 pm »
0

not 10 to 1, more like 2.5 to 1

better pilots, Radar giving early warning, and bombing in daylight.

Germans should have just sent in fighters to raid airfields and engage fighters. Bombers should have came over only in night.

The loses are mainly bombers and stukas

The highest kill ratio for british fighters in the Battle of Britain is the Hurricane due to it's job shooting down easy targets like the 110 and Ju-87's. Not to challenge your imperial knowledge, oh great giver of karma  smiley But I believe the British eventually had a 5-1 kill ratio going. This is credited to the brave RAF pilots of both the Hurricane and the Spitfire.

An EXCELLENT book to read is "Spitfires, Thunderbolts and Warm Beer" which are the diaries of Lee Gover, a volunteer spitfire pilot in the battle of Britain. Excellent first hand accounts. He was the only one in his squad to return from the battle at Dieppe.
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13694


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: November 27, 2008, 12:39:59 pm »
0

I was quoting for the overall planes shot down, not individual by plane type.
Logged
Obergruppenfuhrer
A&A.org Artillery
**
Posts: 213


"Courage is my honour" Shutz Staffel


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: November 29, 2008, 06:32:10 am »
0

I was quoting for the overall planes shot down, not individual by plane type.

Oh ok. So was I but I was talking about their highest level not overall for the entire battle. I could definately be wrong though.
Logged
d142
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1073



View Profile
« Reply #57 on: November 29, 2008, 07:16:03 am »
0

i think it varied considerably throughout the campaign, at times the ratio would have been higher than 2:1, maybe even 5:1, i doubt it would ever have been much higher than that. at other times the ratio would have been in favour of the luftwaffe. i can not say for sure, although i think the ratio was calculated week by week.
Logged
Imperious Leader
A&A.org Heavy Bomber
*
*
*
*
*
*******
Posts: 13694


Sgt. Saunders 351st, King Company


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: November 29, 2008, 11:35:14 am »
0

of course it did as it varied by day and hour. I am talking about cumulative total for the entire campaign in 1940
Logged
d142
A&A.org Fighter
*****
Posts: 1073



View Profile
« Reply #59 on: November 29, 2008, 02:30:09 pm »
0

i have been reading some records taken at the time of the battle of britain accounted day by day,
during the first days the luftwaffe suffered very high losses compared to the RAF, the ratio being as high as 6:1 at times.
i dont know the exact overall ratio of the battle, i suspect it could be as high as 3:1.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

2013 Support Drive
Support Level
Forum Username
Buy Axis & Allies
  • Axis & Allies 1942 [Amazon]
  • A&A Pacific 1940 [Amazon]
  • A&A Europe 1940 [FMG]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • A&A D-Day [Amazon]
  • A&A Battle of the Bulge [Amazon]
  • [eBay]
  • [eBay]
  • WWII Themed Combat Dice [FMG]


Axis and Allies.org Official Sponsor: Field Marshal Games
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!