lol, yeah I've been around.  I am also closing in on 6 years posting on this site.

I can help I'm sure, but I will be slowly integrating the rules.  The whole rule set is a bit much to jump into with a large game group.  I Like most of what I've read and I will comment on the individulal rules when I have played more.

Paint,

That's exactly why I dress like a slut for GenCon.

LOL, are you trying to recrut for the convention?

Yep, just the one you are assaulting from.

I also feel embarressed when I get a string of "unearned" luck.  It is one thing if I put together a hair-brained plan that can pull my butt out of the fire with a good roll or three.  I figure that is good play.  It is entirely different when I start rolling good dice non-stop in a plan where it just starts to decimate the other guy.  I feel sorry for the other guy at that point.

Very true, it's always better to hear "Man, I didn't see that comming" than "If you hadn't had that dice run..."

It feels beter to win with average or even bad dice.

LOL, I do that all the time, but it goes more like: "Eww... I wouldn't do that if I were you...", "Hey Russia you see that?"  "Hey anybody wana bet 5 buck that attack fails?" or "You sure you wanna do that?, you know how my dice have been tonight."

Haha, I love the psy-ops. 

I like playing with NA's. I prefer to roll for them 2 for each of the allies and 3 for each of the axis.  ^ per team.  I do think some of the techs need work and am in the process of implementing some of the alternates I have read about.  I think the Superfortess as it is is a game breaker.

There are no special rules for Greenland.  It is a normal territory like any other.

I'll look on my computer at home and see if I have it, if I do I'll email it to you.

I'll file that one away in the usefull information file.   

Do they have April fools day in Canada?  Thats what I meant by sign

having a electoral college without take all policy would be a more democractic process. the small staes would be worth more (still have 3 points) while big sttates woun't be as importan you can get 14 of the 22 points for the state instead off all 22. that would be better off the smaller states. also dems in the south repulicans in the north etc wont fell like there vote counts as nothing.

I would be interested in seeing what if any effect this would have had on the 2004 elections.

Well if you don't understand the point I am trying to make it's my fault for being unable to explain clearly enough.  I do suggest you do a bit of research on pro=college view points so that perhaps someone else can explain better than I.

That's basicly what I did.  I just wanted to conferm that I wasn't missing anything.  I am going to try to test this again this sunday now that I have had time to iron it out in my brain.

Thanks for the Help IL

Here's an example:

Combined populations of WY, AK, VT, and ND = aprox. 2,317,000 each of these states has 1 Representative

Population of AZ = aprox. 5,580,811 - 4 Representatives

By the way the house of representatives favors the smallest states in the same way the college does.